04-25-2001 Continued Meetingn
~1
I~
1
1
~~~~~~~ ~~) ~~75
CONTINUED .MEETING OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT .COUNTY .BOARD
OF SUPERVISORS HELD THE TWENTY-FIFTH DAY OF APRIL IN
THE YEAR TWO THOUSAND AND ONE
PRESENT: Henry H. Bradby, Chairman
Robert C. Claud, Sr., Vice-Chairman
Stan D. Clark
Richard K. MacManus
Phillip A. Bradshaw
Also Attending:. H. Woodrow. Crook, Jr., County Attorney
W. Douglas. Casket', County Administrator
Donald T. Robertson, Assistant
County Administrator/Director of
Human Resources
Carey H. Mills, Recording Secretary
Chairman Bradby called the continued meeting to order at 2:00 p. m.
for the purpose of conducting a budget work session.
Anne F. Seward, Director. of Budget and Finance, shared with the
Board an information package requested by the various Board members
illustrating a $.O1 -tax increase on Machinery & Tools on the County's three
mayor tax payers in the County. She referenced an effective tax rate and
explained that the County currently assesses at a 100% of the equipment.
She referenced also included is a sheet containing the projected fund balance
for June 30,2001 and noted that this figure will be revised during the next
two (2) months. She noted when she pulls out obligated projects in the
Capital Budget, .$1,700,000 is left in reserves which are for projects
designated for the purposes of economic development, parks and recreation
and cash proffers. She provided the Board with a summary of all cash
proffers by district which must be spent according to the district in which
they are collected which leaves $664,858. available to the County for the
coming fiscal year. She stated also contained in the package is a spreadsheet
of the capital projects expenditures to date. She distributed a copy of the
Page 4 expenditure summary in the amountof $5.8,199,615 which takes the
recommended .cuts in the amount of $830,594.. She stated if the one-time
increase of the State and Federal .grants funds are reduced out, this brings.
the County to a recommended .budget of $56,090,414 which represents a
2.6% increase over the County's current budget and which still requires a
tax rate increase. She presented three (3) proposals, the first column
contains a half percent increase.for County departments;. the second column
includes additional potential cuts the Board. could make of $719,724 which
would bring the.County to a total budget of $57,479,891 and which would
require a revenue adjustment of $492,000 with a two (2) cents on the real
estate rate and three (3) cents on machinery and tools tax; and, the third
column of additional potential cuts provides no revenue adjustment and no
tax rate .increase.
1
a~t,~ ~~ .;;x:.176
Under the Capital Budget, Supervisor Claud stated the Board needs to
be conservative in what it does, but he does not think the Board should stop.
all projects this year with the concept in mind that next year everything will
be better. He stated the Board would: be facing the same things next year as
it is now, only worse. He stated the Board needs to be responsible in how it
spends the funds and do what. needs to be done.
Supervisor MacManus stated he believes the Board needs to continue
moving forward with capital items. He stated one (1) reason the County is
in somewhat of a bind now is because capital expenditures in the school
system were cut out for awhile and he believes you must • always proceed
with. spending some money to meet the needs of the community and he
supports capital this year. He stated there is a need which must be meta
Supervisor Bradshaw stated. he believes the Board must look at bare
necessities. He stated from a business perspective, when. the economy is
down, the first thing companies do is hold up on company expansions and
the capital program is one of the first things the Board must look at. He
stated the economy is-going to pick back up at some point, but the Board
must be prepared for it and take action today. He stated the Board needs to
take a hard look at the capital budget and decide what amount of funds can
be allocated.
Concerning merit and COLA increases- for -the staff, Supervisor
MacManus stated he recommends this be a required part of the budget. He
stated it is a part of responsible government that the Board recognizes that
even though the economy is going one (1) direction, prices continue to
climb and the employees must be taken care of. He recommended a COLA
and. merit combination and stated staff should always be included for a merit
and sometimes, if the performance is not there,. then the pay increase should
not be there. He stated a three (3) percent across-the-board shows no
preference for the top performer verses the lowest performer.
Regarding staffing levels, Supervisor MacManus stated he is open to
additional staffpositions being made, but he does not believe many could. be
supported by the current levels of funding. He stated he does not see
tremendous growth in the staff level.
Ms. Seward stated she met with the County Administrator and
Assistant County Administrator to .address areas that will potentially need to
be addressed. The Code Inspector position was pushed back to a January 1st
date and the Assessor's position back to an April 1st date, both positions
contingent upon the realisations that the County is being told as .far as
development. She noted that $7,500 in part-time funding is included under
refuse collection for the Carrsville/Camptown area, but she would request
feedback as to whether the Board wishes to include this. She also stated the
2
1
'i
s~r.~~. ~J -.:;.~-177
.Maintenance 1 position for the Building and Grounds Department is further
included.
Regarding the County's fee structure, Supervisor MacManus .stated
he County is charging the lowest fee in the entire State and, if increased,
.this is an area that -nominal increases could be realized. Supervisor Clark .
requested a copy of the report done approximately eight (8) years ago
concerning what could be charged by the County for fees.
Regarding. the Assessor's position and Codes Inspector position,
Supervisor Claud recommended that staff develop parameters in writing that
are mutually agreed upon by those involved as to theguidelnesfor adding
positions.
Supervisor Clark requested that staff relay to the Commissioner of
Revenue that the Board desires him to show how the Assessor's position has
saved the County money by April, 2003.
Regarding schools, Supervisor MacManus stated he is disappointed
that the Board did not receive any feedback to the letter the Board directed.
the County Administrator to send to the school administration. He stated it
seems like there is lack of true initiatives to find out what the cuts will be to
get down to .$537,000. He stated. this intelligence would allow the Board to
make better decisions. He stated he would .support the $5.37,000 at this time
as this appears to be what the County can afford.
Supervisor Clark stated he saw the School Superintendent today and
he believes that she would be willing to address the Board because he got-
the feeling that she thought the Board had requested certain information. He
stated she has always been open and willing to discuss their budget
requirements in general.
Supervisor Bradshaw stated if the Board adopts the total amount locale
funding and the State comes back and .provides the schools with additional
money, i.e., teacher's salaries, the Board. will have to .accept the funds and
give it to-the School Board. He stated regarding using proffers for capital, it
is possible the. Board could use part of the proffers to support some of the
school .requests, i.e., additional handicapped buses and repairs to the
buildings.
Chairman Bradby inquired if a tax increase is really necessary.
Ms. Seward stated the County has been nine (9) years without a tax
increase and she believes a tax increase is something the. Board needs to
consider. this year.
Supervisor Bradshaw inquired what the. impact would be if the County
went to semi-annual collection of personal property.
3
r.
gg~r. ~t1 ~N,:; ~78
Ms. Seward stated while the net result would not be significant, it
would be .interest revenue of approximately $150,000.
Supervisor. Claud suggested
that
regarding delinquent tax collection
.
.
,
.that the Treasurer speak with James Windsor, tax collection attorney, to
discuss a solution to .improve the rate of collections.
Supervisor Bradshaw stated he is not in favor of a tax increase. He
stated he is in .favor of utilizing the money in the General Fund because this
is what it is for and it is the taxpayers' :money that has already been paid.
He stated there are a lot of unknowns that could positively impact this and
most of these are in a positive flow as far as revenues, i.e., $300,000 in
chan
in
ta
lle
i
g
g
x co
ct
on, SPSA, upcoming reassessment, State funding,
changing permit fees and connection fee
tili
i
s on u
t
es. He stated the County
would definitely be faced with increasing the rates next year because of the
reassessment.
Chairman Bradby called for a motion to adjourn.. Supervisor Clark
moved the Board adjourn. The motion was adopted unanimously (5-0).
// .
Henry H. Bra by, Chairman
W. Dou skey, Clerk
4