07-20-2000 Regular Meeting80~M 19:x:-320
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS HELD THE TWENTHIETH DAY OF JULY IN THE
YEAR TWO THOUSAND
PRESENT: Phillip A. Bradshaw, Chairman.
Henry H. Bradby, Vice-Chairman
Robert C. Claud, Sr. a
Stan D. Clark
Richard K. MacManus
Also Attending:. H. Woodrow Crook, Jr., County Attorney
W. Douglas Caskey, County Administrator
Donald T. Robertson, Assistant
County Administrator/Director of
Human Resources
Carey H. Mills, Recording Secretary
Chairman `Bradshaw called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and
delivered the invocation.
The Pledge of Allegiance was conducted.
//
Patrick J. Small, Director of Economic Development, requested the
-Board go into .closed session under Section 2.1-344 A of .the Freedom of
Information Act concerning the citing of new industry not previously
publicly disclosed.
Supervisor Claud moved the Board enter closed session for the reason
stated. The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby,
Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no
Supervisors voting against the motion.
Upon returning to open session, Supervisor MacManus moved. the.
Board adopt the following resolution:
CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED.MEETING
WI~REAS, the Board of Supervisors has convened a closed meeting on
this date pursuant to an a~'irmative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom. of Information Act; and,
WHEREAS, 2.1-344..1 A of the Code of Virginia requires a certification
by this Board of Supervisors that such closed meeting was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law;
{
1
f'.
F~~~ 1~ r..:~~21
1
.NOW, THEREFORE,: BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only .public
business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by
Virginia .law were discussed in the closed meeting. to which .this certification
resolution applies, and (ii) only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the closed meeting were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board of Supervisors. .
VOTE
AYES: MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud
NAYS: 0
ABSENT DURING VOTE: 0
ABSENT DURING MEETING: 0
The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby,
Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no
.Supervisors voting against the motion.
//
Supervisor Claud moved the Board amend the .order of the .regular
agenda in order to consider the .Consent Agenda. The motion was adopted.
unanimously (5-0).
//
Chairman Bradshaw indicated the following Consent Agenda included
Items 1, A through C, and asked. if there were any items for removal:
A. Property and CasualtyInsurance Coverage Resolution
B. Delinquent Real Estate Tax Collection Monthly Report
C. June 15, 2000 Regular Meeting Minutes
Chairman Bradshaw requested than the June 15, 2000 Continued
Budget Work Session Minutes be separated from the June 15, 2000 Regular
Meeting Minutes.
Supervisor Bradby moved the Board adopt all items of the Consent
Agenda.. The. motion. was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby,
Bradshaw, Clark .and .Claud voting in .favor of the motion (5-0) and no
Supervisors voting against the motion.
//
2
808M 19 •a.:'~~2
At 7:00 p.m., Supervisor Clark moved: the Board amend the order of
the agenda in order to conduct the public hearings.. The motion was adopted
unanimously (5-0).
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for a public hearing on the following:
An Ordinance. to Amend Chapter 14, Sewers and Sewage
Disposal, Article III, Connection Charges, Section 14-20, to
Provide Reduced Connection Fees for Commercial and
Industrial as well as Residential and to Add Conditions to
Article VI, Building Service Connections for Contracts, New
Account Fees and Deposit.
County Attorney. Crook .explained that the first part of the amendment
is to give the same 1/3 reduction for connection fees for commercial and
industrial properties which the County currently has for residential if
connection is made within ninety (90) days. He advised the second. part is
to add administrative provisions concerning the accounts and the
administrative fee currently in the Water Ordinance that is not in the Sewer
Ordinance.
Chairman Bradshaw .called for persons to -speak in favor of or in
opposition to the proposed Ordinance.
Chairman .Bradshaw closed the public hearing and called for
comments from the Board.
Supervisor MacManus noted the second paragraph of the resolution
references reduced fees for commercial and industrial and he would suggest
adding "existing".
Supervisor Claud moved the Board adopt the following Ordinance
with a change to reflect "existing" on the second paragraph of the resolution
where it refers to fees for commercial and industrial, as suggested by
Supervisor MacManus:
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 14, SEWERS
AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL,. ARTICLE III, CONNECTION
CHARGES, SECTION 14-20, TO DELETE REDUCED CONNECTION
FEES FOR DEVELOPER INSTALLED RESIDENTIAL SYSTEMS
AND SECTION 14-59, TO DELETE COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN
THE-
1000 FEET DEVELOPER INSTALLED EXTENSION TO COUNTY'S
EXISTING SYSTEM
3
+~.
9~4A ' 1~J /~i~r323
WHEREAS, the .Board of Supervisors of Isle of Wight .County,.
Virginia adopted an Ordinance providing for sewers and sewage disposal as
Chapter 14 of the Isle of Wight County Code regarding rates and regulations
on January 16, 1997, effective July 1, 1997, and
WHEREAS, .the Board of .Supervisors of Isle of Wight County,
Virginia deems it to be in the best interest of the citizens of Isle of Wight
County to delete the reduced fees .for connection for new development and
to require developers to extend the County- system to the proposed
developments.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it and it is hereby ordained by the Board of
Supervisors of Isle of Wight. County, Virginia, that: Chapter 14, Sewers and
Sewage Disposal, Article III, Connection Charges, Section 14-20,
Charges generally, subparagraphs (b) and (c) be amended to read as follows:
(b) When application for service, including payment of fees, for existing
single-family residential services is made within ninety (90) .days after
receipt of official connection notice, the connection fees due will be reduced
to one-third (1 /3) of the amounts in (a);
(c) When application for service, including payment of fees,. for single-
family residential services is .made for a system installed totally by a
developer .and conveyed to the County at no cost, the connection fees due
will be reduced to 60% of the amounts in (a);
Further, be it and it is hereby ordained by the Board of Supervisors of
Isle of Wight County, Virginia, that Chapter 14, Sewers and Sewage
Disposal, Article IX, Sewer Line Extensions and System Improvement,
Section 14-59, be amended to read as follows:
Sec. 14-59. Same -When required.
u
New commercial and/or industrial construction.. or development,
manufactured home parks, multiple dwellings and all .subdivisions, within
Development Service Districts and other specifically designated areas, shall
be required to install sewer systems in the development, .and to dedicate the
systems to the County. Where the proposed development is less than one
thousand (1,000) feet from the County's existing. system, the developer will
be required to extend the County's system, in accordance .with the Master
Plan to .the proposed development. Where the proposed development is
more than one thousand (1,000) feet from. the County's existing system, The
developer will be required, at the discretion of the County, to extend the
County system, in ,accordance with the Master Plan to the proposed
development, or to provide dry sewers and local onsite facilities (i.e. septic
tanks, etc.), in compliance with all applicable .regulations, for the
development.. If the County system is so extended, the ,County will
participate, as mutually agreed upon in advance, in the cost of such
4
ao~~ 19 ~N::~324
extensions in excess of one thousand (1.,000) feet. An agreement between
the County and .the developer shall state the improvements required.
Requirements of developers for development,. not within Development
Service. Districts and other specifically designated areas, regarding the
provision of sewer facilities, will be established by, and at the discretion of,
the County.
The. motion .was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby,
Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no
Supervisors voting against the motion.
Chairman Bradshaw called for a public hearing on the following:
The application of Elliot Cohen for a change in zoning classification
from Conditional NC-R1 to General Commercial, approximately three
(3) acres .and .from Conditional NC-Rl to Conditional Urban.
Residential, approximately .1.3.5 acres. Said property is located on the
west side of Carrollton Boulevard (Route 17) between the. Carrollton
Volunteer Fire Station and Ashby Subdivision in Newport Magisterial
District. The purpose of the application is for a residential subdivision
of no more than 40 condominiums, 16 single family residences and
commercial building space, as conditioned.
Jonathan W. Hartley, Director of Planning and Zoning,. advised that
.the applicant has requested that the Board. refer the application back to the
Planning Commission because the application before the .Board is
substantially .different than. originally submitted to the Planning
Commission.
County Attorney Crook advised that when the application was
originally submitted to .the Planning Commission it was for multiple housing.
and commercial. It has now been changed to residential, multiple housing
and commercial and he would recommend it be returned to the Planning
Commission as having been substantially changed from the original '
previously considered by the Planning Commission.
Supervisor Clark moved the Board send the application .back to :the
.Planning Commission for. further review due to substantial changes
submitted by the applicant. The motion was adopted :with Supervisors
MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw,. Clark and Claud voting in favor of the
motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
Chairman Bradshaw called for a public hearing on the following:
The application of Hilda S. Musick Sikes to amend the condition of
Conditional NC-Residential Limited zoning of two (2) parcels of land..
Said parcels are located on the north side of Nike Park Road (Route
669) .east of Jones Creek and west of Waterview Trail in Newport'
S
Tt
60~~~ 19 ~~:-325
Magisterial District. The amendment will enable the sale of the two
(2) parcels to other than family members.
Chairman Bradshaw called for persons to speak in favor of or in
opposition to the application.
Upon no one appearing, Chairman Bradshaw closed the public hearing
and called for comments from the Board.
Supervisor. MacManus stated in the past he has. expressed concerns
when the Board has approved the splitting off o#' different properties. without
proffers to accommodate the impact to the County; however, in this regard,
he has spoken to the Commissioner of Revenue .and .since this property was
divided in 1988, Ms. Musick has been paying substantially higher taxes and,
in essence, has paid the way of the impact fee for these separate properties.
Supervisor Clark stated in light of what Mrs. Musick has paid in taxes
over the last several years, he could also support the application.
Supervisor Bradby moved the Board approve. the application of Hilda-
S. Musick.. Sikes. The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus,
Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting. in favor of the motion (5-0) and
no Supervisors voting against the motion.
Chairman Bradshaw called for a public hearing on the following:
The application of Ivy Johnson. Turner Estate and William R. Turner,
Jr. and Nancy D. Turner for a change in zoning classification from
RAC to Conditional General Commercial approximately 52.4 acres
and to Conditional Light Industrial approximately 10.9 acres. Said
property is located on the north side of Carrollton Boulevard (Route
17) at the terminus with Brewers Neck Boulevard (Route 32), west of
Channell Way (Route 662/663) in Newport Magisterial District. The
purpose of the application is for a .retail shopping center and
office/warehouse use, as conditioned.
Mr. Hartley advised the Board that the applicant had submitted a
request yesterday for the Board to defer consideration of this application
until the Board's August 17, 2000 meeting.. He submitted a letter to the
Board from the applicant containing a set of modified proffered conditions
from those contained in .the Board's agenda package.
County Attorney Crook .advised the Board that it is not unusual for an
applicant to change proffers between the Planning Commission meeting and
Board of Supervisors meeting. He noted that frequently this is a result of
meeting objections or questions at the Planning Commission meeting. He
stated it is only required that proffers be submitted in writing before the
public hearing by the Board of Supervisors.
6
9~~A ~V ~n.~r~~V
Mr. Hartley stated the following changes were made in'the proffers:
Number 9 states a parcel of adequate size will be donated to the County fora
public life safety facility and no .monetary compensation. is desired by the
developer for the property with the exception of pro-rata share of the cost of
the infrastructure and land. development for the donated parcel. The above
was stated and proffered as a condition. that .Armada Hoffler would be the
developer and the current landowner would not be bound by this proffer.- He
continued Number 10 states that in those areas zoned conditional light
industrial, the following uses, shall be prohibited: motor vehicle.. repair,
motor vehicle body shop, and livestock auction.
Chairman Bradshaw called for persons to speak in favor of or in
opposition to the application..
Barbara .Robinson of Carrollton questioned the exact location of the
proposed .site.
Chairman Bradshaw requested Mr. Hartley meet with Ms.
Robinson to further discuss .her questions.
Grace Keen stated Route 17 identifies that the planning of the past has
i
not been a priority and urged the Board to view the Route 17 corridor to
. better understand why it is necessary to welcome new businesses. to our area
to help increase the tax base and with proper planning the County can have a
healthy environment and good quality of life.
Mike Alexander stated the proposed developer is not for the current
needs, but the future needs of this area. He noted that if the future is not as
the developer anticipates, then the County will have a potential problem on
its hands.
Thomas Finderson stated the County. is in need of a more pleasing
entrance into this commercial development. He noted the area is a key
highway corridor and he urged the Board to negotiate a better scenario for a
better entrance. He stated the County is approving projects that have
immense impervious. surfaces and is .the County leading itself to serious
environmental problems by dumping runoff into the -creek systems. He
suggested the Board only approve fifteen (15) areas for this proposed
development.
Chairman Bradshaw closed the public hearing and called for
comments from the Board.
Chairman Bradshaw noted that on page 6 in the agenda, the first
paragraph refers to conditions with the wetlands and ponds although they
are not written up like conditions. He stated. these should be written as
conditions and expanded as to how they will be maintained.
7
,:
90^n _ 19 .r.::~~27
Mr. Hartley notified the Board that the applicant has agreed to meet all
of the improvements stated in the traff c impact study.
Supervisor Clark stated he would like to .have the pond and soil issues
addressed before voting on the matter. He noted he wanted the proper trees
and buffer areas along the Route 17 corridor so that it does not present itself
as a strip shopping center. He inquired if there were any conditions that
follow the owners of the property such as bonds that can be attached to the
property that will apply to a shopping center that has been deserted for a
period of :time to force the owners to restore.. the land to its original
condition, if the property remains unoccupied for a substantial period of
time.
County Attorney stated .the. Board could suggest to the. owner and/or.
developer that this issue be addressed and make a proposal.
Mr. Hartley offered to address Supervisor Clark's issues with the
developer.
Supervisor MacManus .stated that while he believes there is merit in
this project, the .language of the proffers leaves him uneasy because of its
Tack of specifics.
Chairman Bradshaw stressed that the Board .wants the project to meet
or exceed the design standards contained in the County's ordinances due to
the location of the property which is at the gateway to the County.
Supervisor Clark moved the Board accept the request of the applicant
to hold the public hearing at the September 21, 2000 meeting with the
applicant responsible for the cost of further public advertisements. The
motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark
and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no .Supervisors voting
against the. motion.
Chairman Bradshaw called for a public hearing on the following:
The application of .Windsor Woods, LLC to amend NC-C-R1,
- Conditional Residential .Limited Zoning of the Windsor Woods.
Subdivision located on the east side. of Courthouse Highway (Route
258) between Five Forks Road (Route 606) and Court Street .(Route
610) in Windsor Magisterial District. The purpose of the request is to
increase the number of single family lots in .the subdivision from 78
lots to no more than 1241ots, as conditioned.
Chairman Bradshaw called for persons to speak in favor of or in
opposition to the proposed application.
8
'~ col
w
eo~h 1~ ~,.,:~328
Wayne Farmer, Attorney with Barlow and Riddick, ~ stated the
developer of Windsor Woods has conditioned that sewer will be .installed at
.his expense to serve he new lots that are proposed, as well as some of the
existing lots. that have not.been developed. He stated the. developer is also
proffering a $2,000. per lot cash proffer to be paid at the time the lot is sold.
He stated in order to address the concerns of the Town of Windsor, the
developer is proffering to comply with the lot dimension requirements and
setbacks for the Town of Windsor that all lots will be subject to the same
restrictive covenants and comply with the lighting requirements of the Town
of Windsor. He stated Lot 87 would- not be used :as a building lot, but set
aside as a common area. for the location of a permanent sign or conveyed to
the. Town of Windsor. He requested an opportunity later in the meeting to
address concerns of citizens speaking in opposition.
Supervisor Clark asked if the developer of Windsor Woods has had an
opportunity to conduct any meetings with the existing residents of Windsor
Woods to address any concerns.
Attorney Farmer responded he was .unaware of .any meetings being
held to address citizens' concerns.
Lt. Colonel Jack Hosely of Windsor Woods stated he is .opposed to the
proposed application because the proposal will build an additiona165 single
family dwellings on the remaining 39 acres by reducing the size of the lots.
He noted most of the residents moved to Windsor. Woods from larger cities
which had shorter commutes, closer access to shopping, sidewalks,
community pools and recreation areas so that they could get larger lots and
trees, less crime and better schools.. He requested the Board not approve the
application.
Ctinton Osborne of Windsor Way expressed opposition to the increase
in traffic. on .Route .258. He noted the highest accident rate in the County
occurs on Route 258 at Windsor. He stated the developer is proffering
substandard proffers of $2,000 per housing unit.
Judith Songer of Windsor Way expressed opposition to the proposed
application stating that many of he residents moved from a large area to this
area because of its rural character.
Inga Johnson of Oreo Court expressed opposition to the proposed
application.. She stated she chose to live in Windsor Woods because of the
larger lot sizes. She also expressed concern with the safety of children with
the increase of traffic, as well as the close proximity to Route 258 and its
SSmph speed limit.
Michelle Harper of Rohlf Avenue distributed a packet .given to
interested homebuyers. She pointed out that when she purchased her home
she considered both phase I and II which at that time consisted of larger lots.
9
.:
80~h 1~ ~~;5;~~~
She presented a petition containing 158 signatures who have signed in
opposition to the proposed application. She expressed concern with the
inadequate storm water drainage on her street.
Joseph Owens of Rohlf Avenue stated his family bought a home in
Windsor Woods based on a layout represented by the developer that the
entranceway would remain the same. He expressed opposition to an
additiona160 homes being built because of the size of the lots.
Mary Alexander expressed opposition to the proposed application. due
to sandy soil and washed out roads from stormwater runoff.
Catherine Owens of Rohlf Avenue expressed opposition stating she
and her husband built. their home based on information provided from the
reality company and the developer of Windsor Woods. .She expressed
concern with the increased traffic. She. stated had she been provided with
the proposed design of the development she would not have wanted to huild
her home there.. She noted a concern with overcrowding of the schools in
the area.
Ms. Owens read a letter from Holly Saunders of Rohlf Avenue stating
her opposition to the planned rezoning of Windsor Woods because of
environmental reasons. She. noted that the soil for the proposed site of the
new development is not suitable for construction.
Cindy Hosely of Windsor Woods expressed opposition to the proposed
development.. She noted .her family chose to live in this development
because. of its rural character, restful country setting, safety and the large lots
offered. She noted the developer has not yet developed an appealing
entrance, adequate street lighting, trees -and shrubs, sidewalks and
playgrounds; but, now proposes to remove all the trees in the front of the
subdivision.
1
Thomas Finderson expressed opposition to the proposed application.
He pointed out the ravines on either side of the community,. as well as
behind the project. He pointed out the inadequate soil located in the front of
the property. He referred to a draft letter from the Southern Area Review
Committee to the Chesapeake Bay-Local Assistance Department concerning
the. County relative to the six (6) conditions applicable for a finding of
consistency with the Chesapeake Bay Act. He referenced the. letter
concerning the f rst condition which states the area plans for. the Northern
and Central Development Service .Districts shall contain an explicit
discussion on the conflict of guiding development to areas of significant
physical constraints. He stated one of the primary purposes of the
Chesapeake Bay Act regulations is protection of potable water supply.
....Brenda Morgan of Windsor Way read a letter from William Saunders
of Rohlf Avenue requesting that the Board protect the quality of life in
IO
90~~ 1~ rN7''JC.~O
Windsor. Woods by helping the residents keep their tax burdens and
municipal costs down and property values up. He noted the proposed
rezoning will do neither.
Ms. Morgan requested the Board deny the application. She stated the
residents of Windsor. Woods have been ied to by the developer who
portrayed a different, less crowded lifestyle in the subdivision.
Dave Jamison of Windsor Woods stated while he would like to see.
new residents in the County, he would prefer not to have this many homes
approved in this subdivision. He stated he wants to see the subdivision
finished and that the new homes contain the same amount of square footage
or larger.
Mike .Marshall of Windsor Way stated he bought in Windsor Woods
because of -what was proposed in the original .plat. He requested that the
project be finished as it was originally proposed.
.James Morgan of Windsor Way expressed opposition to the proposed
development. He stated he moved from-York County and. selected this
development because of its rural character and family-type neighborhood.
Attorney Farmer addressed the issue of residents being forced to hook
up to the sewer line. He stated there is no intention to take the sewer line to
those existing lots that already perk.. He stated. regarding environmental
concerns, if the lots are not suitable for building, this issue will be addressed
through the appropriate agency. He stated regarding the concern about
overcrowding, there -have only been 42 lots developed .since 1997 or 12 a
year which is not the kind of growth seen in Virginia Beach and Great
Bridge. He stated the proposed lot sizes. are within the lot sizes required by
the Zoning Ordinance and the same deed restrictions will apply to the new
lots as the existing lots. He stated this type of development benefits the
County and it is located in an area that has been designated for residential
development and meets the lot sizes set forth by the Zoning Ordinance.
Chairman Bradshaw closed .the public hearing and called for
comments from the Board.
Supervisor. Clark stated the existing residents of Windsor Woods are
not able to divide their lots, but the developer is requesting the Board to
amend the .subdivision plat so he can do what the existing residents can not
do. He noted some of the residents .who spoke tonight stated they relied on
the existing subdivision plat when they purchased their property.
Supervisor Claud. stated that the .covenants .will remain the same and
existing residents will remain on septic tanks. He stated VDOT is also
requesting that a trafl•ic impact study at Route 258 at the entrance be made.
He expressed a concern with the existing drainage problem which -needs
1
11
.~.
eoo~~ 19 ~_::~-~31
addressing by the developer and also in any proposed areas that would go in.
He recommended the Board table .action tonight and ask the developer to
meet with .the residents of Windsor Woods to see if a compromise. can be
reached.
Supervisor MacManus stated he would like for the developer to
reconsider the amount of its proffers.
Chairman Bradshaw stated that he believes in representing the citizens
of the County, but he also believes in the process the Board has established
and the Board needs to make sure that whatever decision it makes that it
send the message to the Planning Commission that this is the reason the
Board is doing it. He requested Mr. Hartley inform the Planning
Commission of the issues the Board is discussing and that the Board is not
overstepping the process, but that additional issues have been raised that
need addressing.
.Supervisor Claud moved the Board table action for thirty (30) days in
order to allow the developer to meet with the residents to determine if there
is a compromise that can be worked out. The motion was adopted with
Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor
of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
1
Chairman Bradshaw called for a public hearing on the following:
The application of Isle of .Wight County Department. of Parks &
Recreation to hold the "2000 Isle of Wight County Fair" on Thursday,
September 14, 2000 through Sunday, September 17, 2000 on 43.9
acres of land adjoining the Courthouse Complex which is located on
the west .side of Courthouse Highway (Route 258) in Hardy
Magisterial District.
Chairman Bradshaw called for persons to speak in favor of or in
opposition to the proposed application.
.Alan S. Nogiec, Director of Parks and Recreation, advised that at the
Planning Commission meeting he requested .the modification to include
September 9, 2000 due to the rescheduling of the horse show.
Chairman Bradshaw closed the public hearing and called. for
comments from the Board.
Supervisor Claud moved the Board approve. the application of Isle of
Wight County Department of Parks and Recreation, to include the
September 9, .2000 horse show ,activities. The motion was adopted with
Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor
of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors .voting against the motion.
12
a
{
R
//
Supervisor MacManus moved the Board return to the regular order of
the agenda.. The motion was adopted unanimously (5-0).
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for Special Presentations.
Debbie J. Sivertson, Administrative Analyst, made a brief visual
presentation to the Board on Phase I of the County's new web site. She
noted the Internet address for the web site is www.co.isle-of-wiQht va us
Chairman Bradshaw requested Ms. Sivertson prepare an appropriate
public notice to be advertised in the Tidewater News. He further directed
that .she contact the school system .and request that this information be
announced in their newsletters. Supervisor Claud suggested that. an
announcement could also be placed in the Market Basket..
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for Transportation Matters.
Mr. Hartley noted that the quarterly meeting with the VDOT District
Administrator is scheduled- for July 31, 2000 at 2:00 p.m. He also noted that
the issues of the traffic light at New Towne Haven Lane and the drainage
issue in the Central Hill .area would be discussed. He advised that, to date,
he has not received a response from VDOT on these issues.
Mr. Hartley noted that he would be sending a summary listing of all
outstanding transportation issues to the Board for its further reference.
Supervisor Claud requested that the Board entertain .discussion. at its
August 1, 2000 meeting regarding the Route 258 Cypress Connector project
and request that Mr. Hartley discuss same at the next Transportation
Technical .Committee meeting. to advise that the. Board is discussing this
issue and will have a recommendation for them at their next meeting.
Supervisor Bradby noted an interest in attending the VDOT quarterly
meeting and Mr. Hartley requested he contact his office. to coordinate travel
arrangements.
Chairman. Bradshaw requested Mr. Hartley develop a list of road
issues and projects, to include their status, to be included in each_agenda for
the Board's information.
//
1
13
,:
BOOM 19 ~„~:'~L~J
Chairman Bradshaw called for Citizens Comments.
1
Thomas Finderson spoke regarding the Carrollton Cove application.
He noted that 50' is not a proper roadway entrance width, if approved by
VDOT.
Pat Clark requested that the Board, .during its negotiations with
Charter Communications, include a local access channel .for educational
programs. He also expressed a desire to hold Planning Commission
meetings during the evening hours.
Mary Trude made reference to the recent rate increase in her monthly.
cable bill and requested the Board get an explanation for the increase.
John Springfield requested the County investigate the possibility of
spraying for mosquitoes. He further requested .that the County. take
appropriate action to request that VDOT not have openings at the James
River Bridge during peak travel hours.
Supervisor Clark moved the Board direct staff to investigate and bring
back to the Board the cost of participation with the Air Force for the
spraying of mosquitoes. The motion was .adopted with Supervisors
MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of the
motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against .the motion.
Mary Alexander urged the Board to direct staff to make the revisions
to the Comprehensive Plan a top priority. She suggested that volunteers
could be of help to the Planning Department.
Chairman Bradshaw requested the County Administrator to take Ms.
Alexander's request into consideration.
Nancy Quill addressed the Board on the lack of progress being
accomplished with the revisions to the Comprehensive Plana She requested
the Board appoint members to the Citizens Advisory Committee who will
move forward to get the revisions completed.
Mike Alexander commended the Board for its patience tonight in
listening to the concerns of those present during the public hearing on the
Windsor Woods application.
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for the Community Development report.
A. An application by Mr. Robert Swain for an exception to the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance to allow for the
construction of a single family dwelling in the .required fifty foot
14
ao~k 19 ~~::-33~
{50~') Resource Protection Area buffer. Located on Mariner's
Circle adjacent to Moon Creek off Mariner's. Pointe Lane in
Gatling Pointe Subdivision. Newport Magisterial District.
Mr. Hartley referenced a letter submitted by Barlow & Riddick,
Attorneys, requesting that the application be returned to the Planning
Commission so that it -might consider revisions to Mr. Swain's site plan..
Supervisor Clark .moved the Board accept the letter submitted by
William H. Riddick, .III dated July 12, 2000 requesting that the matter be
referred back to the Planning Commisison so that it might consider revisions
to Mr. Swain's site plan. .The motion was adopted with Supervisors
.MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of the
motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
B. Revised Capital Improvements Program for FY2001-2005
Supervisor MacManus recommended that on Parks and Recreation on
the out years 2002/2005 that the $1.5 million be set at $1 million. He
- further recommended that under Parks and. Recreation, in the out .years
beginning with 2001, that funds in the amount of $50,000 be included for
planning purposes.
- Supervisor Claud stated he would like to see the Director of Parks and
Recreation's. report. as to how this would fit in :with the central park and
some of the facilities .there and when that data is received, the Board make.
some kind of decision.
Supervisor MacManus suggested the Board continue negotiations with
the YMCA concerning .the proposal sent to .the County and perhaps
including the funds in the Fall if some agreement is worked out.
Chairman Bradshaw stated he could not .support placing any funding
in the CIP for the YMCA proposal because he has a problem with funding a
project that would not be the County's, but rather for an organization for
profit when .there are so many other recreational needs which need
addressing in the County.
Chairman Bradshaw noted to Mr. Hartley that there is no money
included in the CIP for the purchase of land for the Carrsville Volunteer Fire
Department.
Supervisor Claud moved the Board defer action on the CIP until after
the closed session matter is discussed by the Board concerning matters of
land acquisition. The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus,
Bradby, Bradshaw, .Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and
no Supervisors voting against the motion.
15
rc
~~~~ . 19~ .x:::-335
Mr. Hartley distributed a revised agenda for the Virginia Coalition of
High Growth Communities meeting .scheduled for August 3-4, 2000. He
noted the date of this meeting is also the date of the Board's regularly
scheduled day meeting.
1
The Board noted it would need to change its meeting scheduled for
August. 3, 2000 at 2:00 to another date.
Mr. Hartley advised the Board that he has been notified by the
Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Department that the revisions to the
Comprehensive Plan must be complete by March 31, 2001;. otherwise, the
matter will be referred to the Attorney General's Office. He noted there are
six (6) issues that are being. required by the Chesapeake. Bay Local
Assistance Department to be incorporated into the Plan. Mr. Hartley.
advised the Board that he anticipates -the revisions to be complete and the
revised Comprehensive Plan adopted by January, 2001.
Chairman Bradshaw moved that the Board direct .the County
Administrator and staff to .meet with the appropriate officials in the
Chesapeake Bay Local Assistance Department to obtain a thorough
understanding of why the County is not in compliance;. what actions can be
taken to bring the County into compliance; and, what the County's
alternatives maybe at this point. Following such meeting, a report is to be
made to the Board at its August 17, 2000 meeting. The-motion was adopted
with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in
favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
Chairman Bradshaw requested Mr. Hartley to provide the Board with
a summary update of the progress of the Comprehensive Plan.
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for the Public Utilities report.
t
r
d
E. .Wayne .Rountree, P.E., Director of Public Utilities, stated the
County has received an urgent :need Community Development Block. Grant
to study the water infrastructure needs in Zuni, as well as the housing
rehabilitation needs as a result of Hurricane Floyd. He stated. Dewberry &
Davis has recommended either the total replacement of that utility system at
an approximate cost of $330,000 or .the .replacement of the system to include
larger diameter pipes that will eventually support fire protection at an
approximate cost of $600,000. He stated the potential grant for housing
rehabilitation and the replacement of the water system would be a maximum
of $700,000. He stated to replace the .water system as it is now and meet the
rehabilitation housing needs is anticipated to exceed ~ $700,000 and the
Citizens. Management Team is inquiring if the Board is willing to fund any
.part of the rehabilitation .project with local. dollars. He stated staffs
16
BOQN 19 ~a~:'•1~6
recommendation is that the County not make any commitment of funding for
this system.
Supervisor Claud moved, that for any design completed- for the
replacement. of the water system, that the size. of the line be increased so that
fire protection can be offered at a future time; however, that no .additional
local funds be committed to this infrastructure .project.. The .motion was-
adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw,. Clark and Claud '
voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the
motion,
Chairman Bradshaw recommended that the County Administrator
contact Edna. King to see if additional financial support can be obtained
through regional funds with Isle of Wight/Franklin/Southampton Flood
Relief Fund.
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for the Economic Development report.
Patrick. J. Small, Director of Economic Development, presented.. a
Resolution to Amend the Terms of Appointment for the Members of the Isle
of Wight County Industrial Development Authority for .the Board's
consideration.
Supervisor MacManus moved .the Board adopt the following.
resolution:
RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE TERMS OF
APPOINTMENT FOR THE MEMBERS OF
THE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the terms. of the members of the Isle of Wight County
Industrial. Development. Authority need to be amended to reflect staggered
terms ending on the last calendar day in the month of April in the respective
-years of expiration.
NQW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Isle of Wight, Virginia amend the
terms of appoint for the members of the Isle of Wight County Industrial
Development Authority to reflect the following schedule of expiration:
Carl M. Beale, Jr. April 30, 2001
Ronald H. Pack April 30, 2001
Willie J. Edwards April 30, 2002
Carroll E. Keen, Jr. Apri130, 2002
Richard J. Holland, Jr. Apri130, 2003
17
f;
BOQK 1~ ~;,:~'337
Betty Alphin April 30, 2004
Carson Whitley April 30, 2004
The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby,
Bradshaw, Clark. and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no
Supervisors voting against the motion.
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for the County Administrator's report.
Donald T. Robertson, Assistant County Administrator, Director of
Human Resources, presented a Resolution to Accept and Appropriate Grant
Funding From the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services.
Supervisor Claud moved the Board adopt the following resolution and
that the local match of $12,500 be taken from the contingency fund:
RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE
GRANT FUNDING FROM THE VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES
WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of Criminal justice Services has
approved the Isle of Wight County application for grant funding for an
After-School Academic Enrichment Program; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors needs to accept and appropriate
grant funds in the amount of seventeen thousand six hundred fifty dollars
($17,650). from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services to the
FY2000-01 operating budget of Isle of Wight County.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT AND IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that
the Board of Supervisors of the County of Isle of Wight, Virginia-accept and
appropriate grant funds in the amount of seventeen thousand six hundred
fifty dollars ($17,650) from the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice
Services to the appropriate line item in the FY2000-01 .operating budget of
Isle of Wight County.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Administrator of Isle
of Wight County is authorized to make the appropriate adjustments to the
operating budget andto do all things necessary to give this resolution effect.
The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby,
Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of .the motion (5-0) and no
.Supervisors voting. against the motion.
Richard O. Childress,. Director of Emergency Management, distributed
a copy of an Action-List Regarding Recommendations from the Report on
l8
Lessons Learned from Hurricane Floyd. He also reported that the Fire and
Rescue Association had met and presented its CIP figures. He further noted
the next Association meeting is scheduled for August 1, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. in
the Demonstration Room.
County Administrator Casket' stated staff had previously drafted a
Capital Improvement Projects Policy which was forwarded. to the Board by
mail.
Chairman Bradshaw requested that the draft be included in the August
1, 2000 agenda for consideration by the Board.
Ludford T. Creef, III, Director of Public Works presented a request for
. staffing within his department in the area of trash collection.
Supervisor MacManus moved the Board authorize the redirection of
overtime funding for the Public Works. Department to part-time salaries for
the purpose of refuse disposal. on weekends. The motion was adopted with
.Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor
of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
County Administrator Casket' noted that he would be seeking
suggestions from his Department Heads .relative to the status of action items
being incorporated in some appropriate manner into the Action List.
County Administrator Casket' distributed a letter from the Director of
.Social Services notifying the Board that funding is being returned to the
County in the total amount of $ l 54,000.
Chairman Bradshaw requested the County Administrator send a letter
to Ms. Bean from the Board recognizing her efforts for keeping costs down
and acquiring additional funding..
County Administrator Casket' reminded the Board of the Joint
Legislative Audit and Review Commission meeting scheduled locally for
July 31, 2000 at Princess Anne High School in Virginia Beach.
Chairman Bradshaw referenced a letter from the Mayors and Chairs
Caucus regarding its position. on Standards of Quality in Education.:
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for the County Attorney's report.
.County Attorney Crook stated he has corresponded with the .individual
Board members and provided them with a copy of the State statute regarding
penalties under the Chesapeake Bay Act and he is asking authority from the
19
Board to prepare an amendment to the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area
Ordinance to increase. the penalties from-$1,000 maximum per day to
$5,000 per day with a civil penalty of $10,000 for each violation. He
continued Supervisor Clark prompted an inquiry .about making the property
available for inspection and he proposes an amendment which he forwarded
to the Board to add to the Chesapeake Bay Area .Ordinance enforcement
provisions which gives the Zoning Administrator or his designee, .Planning
Commission members, Board of Supervisors members, including other
members designated by the Board, to have authority to conduct inspections
and surveys upon the property.
Supervisor Clark moved the Board authorize the County Attorney to
advertise a public hearing on both amendments. The motion was adopted
with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in
favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors. voting against the motion.
County Attorney Crook distributed a copy of an inquiry and follow-up
complaint he received concerning the telecommunications services tax for
the Board's information.
County Attorney Crook stated the direction of the Board. concerning
the Planning Commission meeting at night was discussed by the
Commission and many of the Commission members expressed their desire
to continue to meet in the daytime. He stated the Planning Commission did
authorize him to prepare an amendment to its bylaws concerning changing
the meeting time from daytime to evening, which he has prepared and
intends to bring back to the Commission's meeting on August 8, 2000. He
stated the Commission's bylaws require any change be in writing 30 days
prior to acting on it to amend the bylaws so~the actual vote on this would be
at the Commission's September meeting.
Supervisor Claud directed the County Attorney to request the Planning
Commission not to take any .action regarding. the matter of its meeting
schedule until the Board has had an opportunity to meet with the
Commission..
County Attorney Crook reported that he is not prepared to make a
report on the consensus of Planning Commissson, Board of Zoning Appeals
and Industrial Development Authority members being required to fill out
Statements of Economic Interest. He noted that while most members do not
have a problem with filing information regarding their real estate interests,
they do have a misunderstanding on what is required to be filled out on their
personal interests.. He advised he would follow-up with a definition from
the Code of Virginia on what personal interests include.
Regarding .the issue of Yellow Rock Road, County Attorney Crook
reported that he has. completed a title derivation on the road which came
from the Vellines estate and also the derivation on Hideway -Lane. He
20
BOLA ~~ ,::;~~~~
advised he has requested deeds for the lots that are on the road so that he
can be certain the lots are conveyed up to the road with an easement to
include the road.
Regarding the matter of the meeting. with Charter Communications,
Chairman Bradshaw moved the Board direct the Committee (Clark, Caskey,
Crook) to meet with Charter Communications and come to terms on an
agreement not less than. the terms of its agreement with. the City. of SuB'olk.
The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw,
Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors
voting against the motion.
Supervisor Claud requested that during such meeting the committee
find out how many customers Charter has in the County, broken .down by
Franklin, Windsor and Smithfield and what is the plan to serve those with
the rebuild?
County Attorney Crook noted he had several matters for closed session
later in the meeting.
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for Old Business.
Supervisor Clark voted `lea" on the Resolution of Certification .from
the Board's July 6, 2000 regular. meeting that only those matters discussed
while he was present were discussed in closed session.
Upon. inquiry from Supervisor MacManus, County Attorney Crook
informed the Board. that the .meeting concerning the Windsor sewer project
overruns. has not yet taken place.
Upon inquiry from Supervisor MacManus, Mr. Hartley noted he
would bring the matter of the Flood Map Ordinance before the Board
concerning a grandfathering clause to address new maps for existing
businesses.
Upon inquiry from Supervisor MacManus, Mr. Hartley noted he
would provide the Board with a report on the HutchinslHart violations to the
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area Ordinance at its August 1, 2000 meeting.
Upon .inquiry from Supervisor MacManus, County Attorney Crook
.advised he would have the Guidelines for Citizens Comments for the
Board's. consideration at its August 1, 2000 meeting.
//
..Chairman Bradshaw called for New Business.
~.
D
1
21
.:
eo~R 19 ., :~ `3~1
County Administrator Caskey asked for the Board's. consideration of a
date that the. Board and Planning .Commission could hold a work session.
Chairman Bradshaw requested the following items be considered for
discussion in a joint work session between the Planning Commission and
the Board of Supervisors:
Comprehensive Plan Update (growth management issues)
Chesapeake Bay Act.
proffers and impact fees
CIP
. .public comment during Planning Commission meetings
Planning Commission meeting schedule
Chairman Bradshaw directed the County Administrator coordinate a
meeting between the two (2) bodies. The Board noted 8/29, 8/30 and 8/3l
as available meeting dates.
Chairman Bradshaw .moved the Board move its regular scheduled
meeting from August 3, 2000 to August 1, 2000 at 2:00 p.m. The motion
was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and
Claud voting. in favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against
the motion.
Supervisor Claud stated with the merger of GTE and Bell Atlantic,
there would be changes in some of the local calling .areas. Supervisor Claud
moved the Board reactivate the appropriate Communications Committee to
set up a meeting with GTE representatives to review what the local calling.
area will be and try to enhance it, if necessary. The motion was adopted with
Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, .Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor
of the motion (5-0) .and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
County Administrator Caskey distributed a memo from Sheriff Phelps
responding to a suggestion by Supervisor Clark that the Sheriff provide the
.Board with a monthly report of criminal activities within his department.
Supervisor Clark requested the Sheriff provide his monthly report on
criminal activity directly to the County Administrator for distribution to the
Board.
Supervisor Clark presented a request from. Grace Keen, on behalf of
the Isle of Wight Citizens Association, for the waiver of the rental fee for the
Association to utilize a building at Nike Park.
Supervisor Clark moved the Board refer the request of Grace Keen for
a waiver of a building fee to the County Administrator for further review.
Mr. Nogiec is to provide the County Administrator with a report on what
22
eo~K 19 rN~~3~2
fees .the Board has waived in the. past. The motion was adopted with
Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor
of themotion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
Supervisor Clark requested Mr. Robertson to see that. appropriate
compensation is .provided to the Transportation Safety. Committee members
who may not have been properly compensated for their attendance at prior
meetings.
Chairman Bradshaw moved the Board direct the County Administrator
to contact the School Superintendent to set a joint meeting in September or
October between the two (2) bodies to discuss. the Capital. Improvements
Plan, the financial condition, consolidation of services and building
administration projects. The motion was adopted with Supervisors
MacManus, Bradby,. Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor. of the
motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
Chairman Bradshaw moved the Board. direct the County Administrator
to meet with VDOT and discuss- design and construction issues of the
Blackwater River Bridge, (Route 58 Business). The motion was adopted with
Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor
of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
//
Chairman Bradshaw called for Appointments
Chairman Bradshaw. moved the Board delete Item #3, Southeastern
Job Training Agency, from the Appointments List.. The motion was adopted
unanimously (5-0).
Supervisor Claud moved the Board appoint Lud L, Spivey to fill the
unexpired term of William L. Jones as the Town of Windsor's representative
on the Economic Development Committee. The motion was. adopted with
Supervisors. MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor
of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
//
County Attorney Crook requested a closed session under Section 2.1-
344 A3 of the Freedom of Information Act concerning three (3) matters
involving property acquisition for consultation with staff and the Board and .
under Section 2.1-344 A7 concerning legal matter requiring consultation of
counsel and under Section 2.1-344 A7 concerning potential/actual litigation.
Chairman Bradshaw requested a closed session under Section 2.1-344
Al of the Freedom of Information Act concerning two (2) personnel matters.
23
.•.
ea~K ~ 19 .~ ;~ ~~{3
Mr. Small requested a closed session under Section 2.1-344 A3 of the
Freedom of Information Act concerning two (2) matters concerning
acquisition of property and under Section 2.1-344 AS concerning
prospective businesses.
Supervisor Claud requested a closed session under Section 2.1-344 A3
of the Freedom of Information Act concerning three (3) acquisition of
property matters.
Supervisor. Bradby moved the Board enter closed session for the
reasons stated. The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus,
Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and
no Supervisors voting. against the motion.
Upon returning to open session, Supervisor Claud moved the Board
adopt the following resolution:
CERTIFICATION OF CLOSED MEETING
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors has convened a closed meeting on
this date pursuant to an a~rrnative recorded vote and in accordance with the
provisions of the Virginia Freedom of Information Act; and,
1
,I
WHEREAS, 2.1-344.1A of the Code of Virginia requires a certification
a
by this Board of Supervisors 'that such closed meeting .was conducted in
conformity with Virginia law;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors
hereby certifies that, to the best of each member's knowledge, (i) only public
business matters. lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements by
Virginia law were discussed in the closed meeting to which this certification
resolution applies, and (ii) only such public business matters as were identified
in the motion convening the closed .meeting were heard, discussed or
considered by the Board of Supervisors.
VOTE
AYES: MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud
NAYS: 0
1
ABSENT DURING VOTE: 0
ABSENT DURING MEETING: 0
The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby,
Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (S-0) and no
y Supervisors voting against the motion.
24
f
{
Supervisor MacManus moved the Board authorize the agreement. for
the right-of--way. on the Yeoman tract for $2,500 to be prepared by the
County Attorney and executed with the funds to come from the utility
account. The motion was adopted with. Supervisors MacManus, Bradby,
Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in favor of the .motion (5-0) and no
Supervisors voting against the motion.
Supervisor: )~~~acManus moved the Board request the County Attorney
to proceed with an option on the property as discussed in closed session for
an option through November 5, -2000 at the cost specified in closed session.
The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw,
Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors
voting, against_the motion.
Supervisor Claud moved the Board defer action on the CIP policy for
capital outlays for emergency response equipment until August I, 2000. The
motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark
and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting
against the motion.
Supervisor Claud moved .the Board authorize staff to advertise the
Capital Budget for. FY2000-2001 for the Board's August 17, 2000 meeting.
The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw,
Clark and Claud voting in favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors
voting against the motion.
Chairman Bradshaw moved the Board adjust the County
Administrator's salary line item in the budget to add $3,500, effective July
1, 2000. The funds should be taken from the. Contingency .Account. The
motion was adopted with Supervisors. MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark.
and Claud voting. in favor of the motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting
against the motion.
Supervisor Clark moved the Board authorize the County Attorney to
respond to the claim discussed in closed session. The motion was adopted
with Supervisors MacManus, Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in
favor of the .motion (5-0) and no Supervisors voting against the motion.
.~
Supervisor MacManus moved the Board authorize the Economic
Development Director to proceed with qualifying a tract of land discussed in
closed session. The motion was adopted with Supervisors MacManus,
Bradby, Bradshaw, Clark and Claud voting in :favor of the'motion (5-0)-and
no Supervisors voting against the motion..
N
1
1
1
rt
• _,
.BOOK ~9. ~,::'•,~5
At 1:05 a.m., .Supervisor Bradby moved the Board adjourn. The
motion was adopted unanimously (5-0).
hil ' A. Bradshaw, Chairman
z
4
i
}
t
t
qq
t