Loading...
10-01-1987 Regular MeetingPage 400 REGULAR MEETING OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HELD THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER IN THE YEAR NINETEEN HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN PRESENT: Henry H. Bradby, Chairman C. Fred Bailey, Vice Chairman Joel C. Bradshaw, Jr. Thomas L. Ross Richard L. Turner Also attending: H. Woodrow Crook, Jr., County Attorney Myles E. Standish, County Administrator Terry D. Lewis, Planning Director Kenneth Chandler, Assist. to Co. Administrator Betty Scott, Assistant Clerk The Chairman called the meeting to order at 2;07 P.M, At the request of the Chairman, Rev. Hoffman Brown, Pastor of Main Street Baptist Church. // Chairman Bradby suggested the agenda be amended to recognize a County employee for outstanding work. Supervisor Bradshaw moved the agenda be amended as suggested by the Chairman. The vote in favor was unanimous. The Chairman read and presented a plaque to Juanita L. Byrum for her long tenure with the County. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Juanita L. Byrum has served faithfully as a valued employed of Isle of Wight County from December 1960 through September 1987; and WHEREAS, she has served as Zoning Administrator since 1970, Secretary to the Planning Commission, Secretary to ` the Board of Zoning Appeals, Secretary to the Wetlands Board, Assistant County Administrator from May 7 to July 20, 1987; and WHEREAS, her professional experience and leadership have contributed directly to better governmental services to the citizens of Isle of Wight County; and WHEREAS, her personal enthusiasm and spirit of cooperation have enhanced her professional service and broadened her many friendships. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors extends to Juanita L. Byrum its best wishes for her future endeavors and orders a copy of this Resolution be spread upon the Minutes of the Board this 1st day of October, 1987. // R. W. Coates, Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation, informed the Board members the Highway Department will begin work on the bridge on Route. 620 .around the 15th of October. 1 1 October 1, 1987 Page 441 Chairman Bradby asked the Highway Department's assi:stance in getting drain pipes installed in driveways along Route 2013 in the subdivision. Mr. Coates told Mr. Bradby if the property owners would furnish the pipe the Department would install same. Mr. Coates and Mr. Bradby are to meet to formulate a plan. // ~ .Chairman Bradby called for a public hearing on "An Ordinance To Provide Standards For Naming Streets, Fabrication, Erection and Maintenance of Street Name Signs And To Establish A Street Address Numbering System". County Attorney. Crook stated the ordinance had been prepared for the Planning Commission Committee which was established for this program. Several meetings have been held by the Committee and the Planning Commission changes made and it is now being presented to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. Supervisor Turner moved the Board adopt the "Ordinance To Provide Standards For Naming Streets, Fabrication, Erection And Maintenance Of Street Name Signs and To Establish A Street Address Numbering System". The motion carried unanimously. AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE STANDARDS FOR NAMING STREETS, FABRICATION, ERECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF STREET NAME SIGNS AND TO ESTABLISH A STREET ADDRESS Ni1MBERING SYSTEM 1 1. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for a uniform County wide system with respect to naming of streets, fabrication, erection and maintenance of street name signs and assigning street numbers to all principal buildings to assist fire and rescue companies, law enforcement agencies, the Postal Service, and the general public in the timely and efficient provision of services to residents and businesses of the County. 2. Administration.. (a) The County Administrator or his designated agent is hereby designated as the agent of the Board of Supervisors of Isle of Wight County, Virginia, responsible for the administration, implementation and enforcement of this ordinance. (b) The agent shall establish street names in accordance with guidelines herein as follows: ~_ (1) Choice of Names. Names should be pleasant sounding, appropriate and easy to read so that the public can handle the name in an emergency situation. The use of similar sounding names shall be avoided.. Where desired the names should promote the history or traditions of the County. Surnames of living persons should not be used except pioneering families or historically significant names. Un- conventional spelling shall not be used. (2) Duplication. Duplication of names are to be avoided. The agent shall keep a list of the street names in the County including the incorporated Towns within the County so that the names will not be duplicated. (3) Continuity. Continuous roads as indicated by State Route numbers shall bear the same name throughout the County where practical. In October 1, 1987 Page 402 situations where the road takes a sharp turn in direction for considerable distance, the affix may be changed to indicate the change in direction. Short cul-de-sacs that provide frontage for three or less lots may bear the same name of the road it intersects. Names of streets within the incorporated Towns which continue in the County shall wherever possible bear the same name in the County. (4) Generic Classes of Roads for Street Name Suffixes. (i) Highways.. Primary roads, such as, Routes 258, 10, 58, 460, 17 and 32. (ii) Boulevards. Primary roads or major collector roads with landscaped divided medians or unusually wide landscaped rights-of-way, .such as Routes 10, 32/58 and 17, or the entrance to Carisbrooke subdivision. (iii) Drives. Major east-west through secondaries (secondaries carrying traffic from one sector to another or through the County) or collectors, such as, Routes 626, 637, 603, 616 and 611, or Routes 669 and 665. (iv) Roads. Major north-south through secondary or collectors, such as Routes 620, 644, 600 and 621 or Routes 661, 704 and 676. (v) Parkways. Reserved for especially scenic routes along rivers or through park-like landscaping. (vi) Loops, Circles and Ways. Short deadend subdivision streets. {vii) Court. deadend subdivision streets. Short, permanently (viii) Streets. a basic gridiron subdivision. North-south streets in (ix) Avenues.. East-west streets in a basic gridiron subdivision. (x) Lanes. Private streets.. (c) The agent shall establish street address numbers in accordance with guidelines established herein as follows: (1) Assignment of addresses. Street addresses shall be assigned by the agent to each lot on new final subdivision plats at the time of re- cordation. The agent shall then notify the re- spective developer of these addresses. (2) Renumbering. The agent shall undertake a systematic renumbering program for streets within the County in accordance with the policies and guidelines established herein. In the interim, as building permit applications are filed for development on parcels along streets which have not yet been systematically renumbered, the agent shall determine and assign an appropriate street address number for such development prior to approval of such building permit. (3) Atlas. As street address numbers are determined and assigned by the agent as provided above, such number shall be recorded in an official street number index and atlas to be maintained by the agent n 1 1 October 1, 1987 Page 403. and kept available for reference in the office of real estate assessment and in the office of the department of code compliance. No building permit shall be approved until a street address has been determined and assigned from the index map and atlas, or in the absence of a listing for that particular parcel in the official index, until such building permit application has been referred to the agent for a street number determination. (4) Notification. The affected property owner or current occupant shall be notified by the agent in writing of any address change. The property owner shall be responsible for notifying the Postal Service, utility companies and other interested parties of any address change or new address. (5) Displaying Numbers. Within sixty (60) days after the receipt of written notification of change of address, the owner or occupant shall affix/ display the assigned number as prescribed herein. (6) New Numbers. It shall be the duty of such owner or occupant, upon affixing the new number, to remove any different address number. The cost of the new numbers shall be the responsibility of the property owner. (7) Determination of Numbers. Address numbers shall be based on the location of an individual parcel within a block. 1 (8) Block. Each segment of a street formed by intersecting streets shall be considered a separate block provided however, that where the distance between intersections is more than twelve hundred (1200) feet, each twelve-hundred-foot interval shall establish a separate block. Blocks within subdivisions however, shall be construed to be the segment of a street between intersections. (9) Odd and Even Numbers. Proceeding from the point of beginning, even numbers shall be assigned to the parcels situated. on right sides of streets, and odd numbers shall be assigned to left sides. (10) Series of Numbers. Numbering series shall begin with the number 200, and shall begin as follows: (i) Where a street begins at an arterial or collector .road, then street numbering shall begin at that point of intersection. 1 (ii) Where a street crosses an arterial or collector road, or when a street connects and terminates at arterials or collector roads, then street numbering shall begin at the southernmost or westernmost end of that street. Provided, however, that where possible, street prefix designations (north, east, etc.) shall be assigned to intersecting streets having the same name on either side of the arterial or collector and both segments shall be numbered as prescribed hereinabove, pursuant to Section 15.1-379 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. (iii) Numbers shall increase consecutively from said point of beginning, with two (2) numbers (one even and one odd) assigned or reserved for every fifty (50) feet of street frontage for single-family residential areas, and two (2) numbers reserved for every twenty-five (25) feet of frontage of commercial and multifamily areas. October 1, 1987 Page 404 (11) Reservation of Numbers. Only those properties which have a princiQal structure shall be assigned a street address. Numbers shall be reserved, however, for vacant parcels in accordance with the intervals described above; provided, however, that in platted subdivisions, consecutive street numbers shall be assigned to consecutive lots rather than at the prescribed intervals. Additional numbers shall be reserved for oversized lots within subdivisions based on zoning district frontage requirements to accommodate potential future divisions. (12) Building Group Numbers. For multi- family, commercial and similar developments where density of development may render the above described addressing intervals ineffective, a building or building group may be assigned•a single number and a numerical or alphabetical suffix may be assigned to each dwelling unit, business, or establishment within such building or building group. (13) Continuity of Numbers. Where major roads enter the county from another jurisdiction, street address numbers may be assigned as a continuation of the numbering series used in that jurisdiction. (d) In applying the guidelines specified herein, the agent shall have the authority to make minor adjustments and modifications to ensure a logical and efficient street address system. (14) Maintenance of Numbers. It shall be the responsibility of the owner or occupant to maintain the numbers in good discernible condition. 3. Size and location of street address numbers. (a) Street address numbers for residences shall not be less than three (3) inches in height and shall be made of a durable and clearly visible material. The numbers shall be conspicuously placed on, above, or at the side of the main entrance so that the number is discernible from the street.- Whenever a building is more than fifty (50) feet from the street, or when the entrance is not visible from the street, the number shall be placed. along a walk, driveway, or another suitable location so that the address number is discernible from the street. A second and third set of property numbers must be placed on both sides of mailbox or other suitable mount adjacent to drive- way and edge of roadway. (b) Street address numbers or letters shall be of a contrasting color to the background on which they are mounted. (c) All commercial and industrial structures shall display street address numbers of not less than four (4) inches .in height as follows: (1) When possible, the number shall be displayed over the main entrance to the structure. (2) There shall be no other wording or numbers within two (2) feet of the building number. (d) Apartments, townhouses, shopping centers other similar groupings where only one number is assigned shall display such number at the main entranceway. Said address numbers shall have a minimum height of ten (10) inches. Numbers for individual units or establishments within the complex shall be 1 1 i~ October 1, 1987 Paqe 405 displayed on, above or to the side of the main doorway of each unit or establishment. 5. Street name signs standard. fl (a) General. Metal. street signs of standard design approved by the agent for use on ail streets shall be erected on metal poles, at points designated by the agent, and paid for in advance of erecting by the subdivider in the cases of subdivision. (b) Location. At each intersection of public streets within the County, at least one (1) street name sign displaying the name of each street shall be erected and maintained. Whenever possible, street name signs shall be located in the right-hand corner of the intersection on the approach side from a major thoroughfare. When this-ia not possible, street name signs. shall be located in the next most suitable corner as determined by the Director of Public Works. f] (c) Erection and Fee - Public Streets. At the request'of a developer and upon receipt of a fee sufficient to cover the cost of materials and labor, as determined by the Director of Public Works, the County shall fabricate, erect and thereafter maintain street name signs at the intersections of new streets. The fee shall be paid at the time the plat is recorded. A developer may specify that street name signs are to be erected immediately, upon notification, or at the time the street is accepted into the State secondary system. Should a developer request street name signs to be erected prior to the new streets being accepted into the State secondary system, he shall be responsible for their maintenance until such time as the streets are accepted into the system. Prior to the County accepting a new street for inclusion into the State system, the County shall make an inspection to determine that all street name signs are in a state of good maintenance. Should any street name signs be missing or in need of repair, the developer shall pay the full cost for the replacement and/or repair thereof. (d) Erection and Fee - Private Streets. At the request of the majority of the owners of a private street and upon receipt of a fee sufficient to cover the cost of materials and labor, as determined by the Director of Public Works, the County may fabricate, erect, and thereafter maintain a street name sign at the intersection of the private street and a public street. (e) Description of Signs. Street name signs bearing the name of public streets shall be of green background with four (4) inch white letters. Street name signs bearing the names of private streets shall be of blue background r~ith four. (4) inch white letters. For all signs, abbreviations shall be two (2) inch white letters and no street name shall exceed fifteen (15) letters, including abbreviations and spaces. 6. Enforcement. (a) Whenever the agent. has reason to believe there has been a violation of any provision of this article, he shall give notice of such violation to the person failing to comply and order said person to take corrective measures within thirty (30) days from the date of notification. (b) If such person fails to comply with the duly issued order, the agent shall initiate necessary actions to terminate the violations through criminal October 1, 1987 ~ Page 406 and or civil measures. 7. Penalties. Any violation of any provision of this article shall constitute a Class 4 misdemeanor. Subsequent to the thirty-day period following notification of violation, each day of violation shall constitute a separate violation. The Chairman called for a public hearing on the request of the Isle of Wight/Smithfield Chamber of Commerce to hold a music festival on October 14, 1987 at Morgart's Beach in Hardy Magisterial District. Connie Rhodes, of the Chamber of Commerce, appeared and stated this would be their 20th Annual Chamber Day and asked the Board to vote favorably. On motion of Supervisor Ross, the Board voted unanimously to approve the request of the Isle of Wight/Smithfield Chamber of Commerce to hold a music festival on October 14, 1987 at Morgart's Beach in Hardy Magisterial District. Chairman Bradby called for a public hearing on the following rezoning applications: 1. The application of Odelle S. Carr for a change ir_ zoning .classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to R-A, Rural Re- sidential, .9752 acre of land located off the south side of Route 638, in Hardy Magisterial District. The purpose of the application is for a rural residential lot. T. A. Powell, Mrs. Carr's nephew, appeared to represent the application and stated he would be willing to answer any questions the Board members may have. No one appeared in opposition. Supervisor Bradshaw moved the Board approve the application of Odelle S. Carr for a change in zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to R-A, Rural Residential, .9752 acre of land located off the south side of Route 63$, in Hardy Magisterial District. The vote in favor was unanimous. 2. The application of Ronald L. Minton for a change in zoning classification from R-A, Rural Residential, to R-MH-A, Rural Mobile Home District, 1.111 acres of•land located on the east side of Route 681, at the Routes 681 and 683 intersection, in Hardy Magisterial District. The purpose of the application is for the permanent location of one mobile home. Regina Minton appeared and stated they had purchased a lot on Route 681 and is requesting rezoning for a double wide mobile home. No one appeared in opposition. Supervisor Turner moved the Board approve the application of Ronald L. Minton for a change in zoning classification from R-A, Rural Residential, to R-MH-A, Rural Mobile Home District, 1.111 acres of land located on the east .side of Route 681, at the Routes 681 and 683 intersection, in Hardy Magisterial District. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Board. 1 D October 1, 1987 Page 407 3. The application of Smithfield Swine .Ranch, owner, and. Christian Well grilling, prospective owner, for. a change in zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to Con- ditional M-1, Conditional Industrial Limited, 5.15 acres of land located on the east side of Route 620, between Routes 655 and 644, in Newport Magisterial District. The purpose of the application is for truck rig storage, maintenance, and repair; plumbing supply storage and a business sign for a well drilling operation. Ted Christian, co-owner, appeared and stated the land is presently zoned agricultural and they would like to use the land for a small well drilling operation. Mr. Christian continued stating the operation will not proposed any more problem than the swine operation and feels it will be an asset to the County. Mr. Christian further stated there will be no visual and noise pollution as the area is surrounded by trees. The well drilling trucks are not any larger than the swine trucks, stated Mr. Christian. Mr. Christian stated the Planning Commission denied the application because the proposed use is not compatible with the growing residential use of the land in the area. Gurley .Barlow, co-owner, stated the hog .business was good, but the hogs do not stay at home. Mr. Barlow stated he wished the Board would give favorable consideration. He (Mr. Barlow) stated he would not want to do anything to hinder growth in isle of Wight County. 1 Cecil W. Gwaltney, adjoining property owner, appeared and stated the property is in an area which is becoming residential. Mr. Gwaltney continued stating the pig parlor business had been there some years back and stayed in operation for a while. Mr. Gwaltney stated he feels it would be wrong to allow the proposed business in the area because it is a residential area and we should keep this property in line with what is there now. Mr. Gwaltney stated the proposed use of the property. affects him mostly as he borders on three sides of the property in question. Planning Director Lewis stated the Planning Commission recommended denial .noting that the property was better suited for residential development similar to that currently being developed in the area because of the area's development trends and because it would not be in keeping with good planning to permit industrial type uses to be located within a developing residential area and on roadways that primarily serve residential neighborhoods. He said the Planning Commission suggested that a location on a primary road within an existing commercial or industrial area or an area anticipated for business development would be the best location for this type of proposed business. 1 Mr. Lewis continued stating the Department of Highways and Transportation has advised that the entrance to this property would have to be a commercial entrance constructed in accordance with standards of the Department of Highways and Transportation and that any outdoor advertising associated with the proposed business must be approved by the Department of Highways and Transportation. Following general discussion, Supervisor Ross moved the Board accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and deny the application of Smithfield Swine Ranch, owner, and Christian Well Drilling, prospective owner, for a change in zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to Conditional M-1, Conditional Industrial Limited, 5.25 acres of land located on the east side of Route 620, between Routes 655 and 644, in Newport Magisterial District. The October 1, 1987 Page 408 motion passed with Supervisors Ross, Bailey and Bradby voting aye and Supervisors Turner and Bradshaw nay. 4. The application of Alda O. Garner and W. B. Owen for a change in zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to R-1, Residential Limited, 25 acres of land located on the south side of Route 1903, between C. L. Obrey Subdivision and Cedar Grove Farm, in Newport Magisterial District. The pur- pose of the application is for a re- sidential subdivision. Ann Simpson Jones, attorney, appeared to represent the applicants and stated the Planning Commission unanimously approved the application on September 8th and she asked the Board to do the same. No one appeared in opposition. Supervisor Bradshaw moved the Board approve the application of Alda O. Garner and W. B. Owen for a change in zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to R-1, Residential Limited, 15 acres of land located on the south side of Route 1903, between C. L. Obrey Subdivision and Cedar Grove Farm, in Newport Magisterial District. The vote in favor was unanimous. 5. The application of Richard L and Edna B. Turner, owners, and Stephen B. Strickland,. Inc. prospective owner, for a change in the zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to Conditional R-1, Conditional Re- sidential Limited, approximately 87 acres of land located on the west side of Route 10, between Routes 620 and 600, in Newport Magisterial District. The purpose of the application is for no more than 93 single family re- sidential lots. Supervisor Turner stepped down from the dias and joined the audience because of a conflict of interest. Sterling Webster, representing the applicant, appeared and stated they are seeking zoning that will allow the creation of a subdivision of no more than 93 single family dwellings. The developers offered the following proferred conditions, (1) a 50 foot scenic landscaping easement parallel with Route 10, (2) landscaped center island at main entrance, (3) no more than 93 lots, (4) paved streets to be provided, (5) a 50 foot wide landscape visual buffer along Route 10 to~help block the view of the development from Route 10 and (6) a landscape median strip will be provided at the main entrance. Mr. Lewis stated the the Planning Commission voted to recommend approval noting the maximum number of lots, 93, was close to the number that could be developed if the land was zoned R-A. It also noted that the buffer along Route 10 and the proposed landscaped entrance would help the subdivision be less obtrusive to its surroundings. Additionally, it note that its location on Route 10 will provide direct access to a primary road and there are a number of existing or anticipated subdivisions in this general area. Mr. Lewis further reported that the Public Service Authority noting that the proposed County Water and Sewer Master Plan recommends central water to be conveyed to the 1 f1 1 October 1, 1987 Page 409 1 County Authority, unanimously voted to recommend that the applicants add a condition stating the central water system anticipated for the development will be constructed in accordance with the regulations of the Public Service Authority and will be conveyed to the Public Service Authority at no cost if accepted by the Authority. The Department of Highways and Transportation noted the main entrance to the development must be aligned with the existing crossover on Route 10 and that a complete set of road construction plans must be submitted for review of the Department. Robert P. Taylor, Jr., adjoining property owner on the north side of the property, appeared in opposition. Mr. Taylor stated he has a general purpose farm consisting of hogs and cattle raising and farming. Mr. Taylor further stated he is opposed because it is too much of a jump at one time. The area is located in the Longview Agricultural District which is large, stated Mr. Taylor. Mr. Taylor continued stating he has no plans whatsoever to have any kind of business except farming and the adjoining property owners do not plan to change their farming operations. Mr. Taylor stated the 93 homes is not in keeping with the area and traffic will be a problem. Mary Jean Scott spoke in opposition stating she would like to see the area remain as it is because if the farming operation decreases their heritage *ail~ change. She doesn't want to see homes built on the farmland. Sterling Webster stated the main reason they requested R-1 zoning was for lot configuration to address the septic tank situation, not high density. D Following discussion, Supervisor Ross moved the Board accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and aAprove the application of Richard L. and Edna B. Turner, owners, and Stephen B. Strickland, Inc., prospective owner, for a change in zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to Conditional R-1, Conditional Residential Limited, approximately 87 acres of land located on the west side of Route 10, between Routes 620 and 600, in Newport Magisterial District. The motion carried with Supervisors Ross, Bradshaw and Bradby voting aye and Supervisor Bailey nay. Supervisor Turner did not vote. // Rev. Vincent L. Thomas, Pastor of the First Gravel Hill Baptist Church, stated he was outraged and angry with the County's hiring practices. Rev. Thomas quoted excerpts from the local newspapers .relative to persons being employed by the County and stated that Doug Caskey, who has been employed as Community Development Director, has a degree in geography and minored in urban and regional planning. Rev. Thomas further stated that two employees from Suffolk had been hired and another one which is a recent graduate. Rev. Thomas feels the best applicants were not offered the job and also stated many persons were not given an .interview. Rev. Thomas feels consideration should be fair for everyone. 1 Wesley Wills, real estate broker representing the Robert Allen Johnson estate, appeared and asked the Board's consideration and assistance regarding the sewer and water in that area. Mr. Wills stated he understood some progress was being made, but they need sewer as quickly as possible because they have the possibility of selling_property for an industrial venture. Mr. Wills further stated he had discussed this situation with the Public Service Authority. // October 1, 1987 Planning Director Lewis presented the following conditional use permit application for the Board's consideration: The application of Marie B. King, owner, and Commonwealth Gas Pipeline Corporation, prospective owner, for a conditional use permit to erect a 16' x 16' structure for measuring and and regulating natural gas distribut- ion, on 36 acre of land located on Routes 32 and 258, in Newport Magisterial District. Page 410 Chairman Bradby stated the applicant had sent a litter requesting the application be withdrawn. On motion of Supervisor Turner, the Board voted unanimously to grant the applicant's request to withdraw his application. // At 3:17 P. M. Supervisor Turner moved to have a ten minute recess, which passed unanimously. The Board reconvened at 3:35 P. M. // County Attorney Crook stated he had a matter for executive session. Supervisor Turner moved the Board go into executive session for the purpose of discussing with legal counsel and staff members land acquisition, public use of county property, personnel and intergovernmental contract negotiations. The vote in favor was unanimous. The Board went into executive session at 3:36 P. M. and returned to open session at 5:07 P. M. // County Adn-instrator Standish recommended the Board agree to the offer of the Public Service Authority to construct the sewer line extension in the Camptown/Jamestown area and the previous action of the Board regarding the deeding of the system at the conclusion of the talks with the City of Franklin'. Supervisor Bailey moved the Public .Service Authority be authorized to negotiate rates/fees with the Town of Smithfield for water distribution system of Cypress Run development. The motion carried unanimously. On motion of Supervisor Ross, the Board voted unanimously to advise County Attorney Crook td request the School Board to deed the waterline running from the Town of Smithfield to the new Smithfield High School to be deeded ~~ the County. At 5:10 P. M. Supervisor Turner left the Board meeting. // Supervisor Ross moved the Board accept the State/Local hospitalization contracts as presented by the Social Services Department and authorized Linda Bean, Director of Social Services, to re-negotiate the with Mary Immaculate Hospital regarding rates. The motion passed by unanimous vote of the Board. Supervisor Turner was absent when the vote was taken. State - Local Hospitalization 1 1 1 1986-87 1987-88 1 October 1, 1987 Page 411. Hospital In-Pat. Out-Pat. In-Pat. Out-Pat. Lousie Obici $352.49 $239.69 $376.84 $256.25 Riverside 340.05 231.23 361.31 245.69 Walter Reed 297.97 202.62 302.34 204.91 Mary Immaculate 350.00 239.00 467.67 318.02 Hampton General 342.93 233.19 385.97 262.46 Southampton Memorial 327.88 222.96 281.94 292.72 Supervisor Ross moved the Board approve the suggestion of the Commissioner of Revenue, Gerald H. Gwaltney, for a correction of assessments and refunds ordinance for the County with the .condition the proposed ordinance be amended to state the County Aiaorney gill review and approve same. Supervisor Bailey amended the motion to add upon certification by the County Attorney the Board can authorize the Treasurer to make the refunds. The vote in favor was unanimous. Supervisor Turner was absent when the vote was taken. On motion of Supervisor Ross, the Board unanimously voted to adopt the resolution approving the $1.3 million bond issue for School capital improvements. RESOLUTION At a regular meeting of the Board of Super- visors of Isle of Wight County, Virginia, held on the 1st day of October, 1987, at which the following members were present and absent: D Present: Henry H. Bradby C. Fred Bailey Joel C. Bradshaw, Jr. Thomas L. Ross Absent: Richard L. Turner The following resolution was adopted by a majority of all members of the Board of Super- visors by a roll call vote, the ayes and nays being recorded in the minutes of the meeting as shown below: Member Vote Henry H. Bradby Aye C. Fred Bailey Aye Joel C. Bradshaw., Jr. Aye Thomas L. Ross Aye RESOLUTION RATIFYING AWARD OF $1,305,000 SCHOOL BONDS, SERIES OF 1987, OF ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TO VIRGINIA PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY, AND CHANGING DESIGNATION OF PAYING AGENT 1 WHEREAS, by resolution .adopted on August 27, 1987 (the Prior Resolution), the Board of Supervisors of Isle of Wight County, Virginia (the County), provided for the issuance of $1,305,000 School Bonds, Series of 1987 (the Bonds)j WHEREAS, such resolution authorized the County Administrator to awar3 the Bonds to the Virginia Public School Authority (the Authority). at such inter^st rate or rates as would produce a differential in each year of not more than one-tenth of one percent (1/10 of 18) over the annual rate to be paid by the Authority on the bonds it will sell to provide funds to purchase the County's Bonds, provided that the net interest cost to the October 1, 1987 County should not exceed 98 per year] Page 412 WHEREAS, on September 17, 1987, the County Administrator on behalf of the County awarded the bonds, bearing interest at the annual rates shown on Exhibit A hereto, to the Authority; and, WHEREAS, the County has been requested to change the designation of the paying agent for the Bonds; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPER- VISORS OF ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY, VIRGINIA: 1. The action of the County Administrator on September 17, 1987, awarding the Bonds to the Authority, is hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. The Bonds shall bear interest at the annual rates shown on Exhibit A. 2. The Paying Agent for the Bonds, as described in Section 3 of the Prior Resolution, shall be Dominion Trust Company, Richmond, Virginia. The undersigned Clerk of The Board of Supervisors of Isle of Wight County, Virginia, hereby certifies that the foregoing con- stitutes a true and correct extract from the minutes of a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors held the 1st day of October, 1987, and of the whole thereof so far as applicable to the matters referred to in such extract. Supervisor Ross moved the Board adopt the resolution calling upon the County to provide increased financial support for programs for mentally disabled citizens. RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY WHEREAS, The County of Isle of Wight is concerned about our mentally disabled citizens, and WHEREAS, many disabled citizens are unserved or under-served, and WHEREAS, the County of Isle of Wight supports the Western Tidewater Community Services Board with local tax funds, and WHEREAS, the County of Isle of Wight has only limited resources to fund services which have traditionally been the purview of State government, and WHEREAS, community services for the mentally disabled citizens are already limited throughout the Commonwealth, and the demand for such services are ever in- creasing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT the County of Isle of Wight Board of Super- visors requests the Governor and the General Assembly to provide and support a major funding initiative for services for the mentally disabled as the high priority issue for the 1.988-1990 Biennium. Supervisor Bailey moved the Board authorize County Administrator Standish.-to submit comments relative to the 1 October 1, 1987 Page 413 Chesapeake Bay Agreement urging that no new mandates be placed on the County without equivalent financial support and in addition, requirements placed on the County must also provide for appropriate protection from liability for any measures taken to manage growth in a responsible manner. The motion carried unanimously. Supervisor Turner was absent when the vote was taken. On motion of Supervisor Ross, the Board voted unanimously to approve the Federal Government/Corps of Engineers grant funds, and authorized the Chairman to sign same, for improvements to the Nike Park area under the program to clean up. Supervisor Turner was absent when the vote was taken. // Supervisor Bailey moved the Board approve the General Fund Bill Register as amended. The vote in favor was unanimous. Supervisor Turner wa.s absent when the vote was taken. // County Attorney Crook informed the Board that the September 3, 1987 minutes were not ready for approval. I/ At 5:24 P. M. Supervisor P.oss moved the meeting be adjourned, which passed unanimously. Supervisor Turner was absent when the vote was taken. 1 1 ~f ~/ % - tom- li i~ ~~ienry H. Bradby, Chairman