10-01-1987 Regular MeetingPage 400
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS HELD THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER IN THE YEAR
NINETEEN HUNDRED EIGHTY SEVEN
PRESENT: Henry H. Bradby, Chairman
C. Fred Bailey, Vice Chairman
Joel C. Bradshaw, Jr.
Thomas L. Ross
Richard L. Turner
Also attending: H. Woodrow Crook, Jr., County Attorney
Myles E. Standish, County Administrator
Terry D. Lewis, Planning Director
Kenneth Chandler, Assist. to Co.
Administrator
Betty Scott, Assistant Clerk
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 2;07 P.M,
At the request of the Chairman, Rev. Hoffman Brown, Pastor
of Main Street Baptist Church.
//
Chairman Bradby suggested the agenda be amended to
recognize a County employee for outstanding work.
Supervisor Bradshaw moved the agenda be amended as suggested
by the Chairman. The vote in favor was unanimous.
The Chairman read and presented a plaque to Juanita L.
Byrum for her long tenure with the County.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Juanita L. Byrum has served
faithfully as a valued employed of Isle of
Wight County from December 1960 through
September 1987; and
WHEREAS, she has served as Zoning
Administrator since 1970, Secretary to
the Planning Commission, Secretary to `
the Board of Zoning Appeals, Secretary
to the Wetlands Board, Assistant County
Administrator from May 7 to July 20,
1987; and
WHEREAS, her professional
experience and leadership have
contributed directly to better
governmental services to the
citizens of Isle of Wight County;
and
WHEREAS, her personal enthusiasm
and spirit of cooperation have
enhanced her professional service
and broadened her many friendships.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED
that the Board of Supervisors
extends to Juanita L. Byrum its best
wishes for her future endeavors and
orders a copy of this Resolution be
spread upon the Minutes of the Board
this 1st day of October, 1987.
//
R. W. Coates, Resident Engineer, Virginia Department of
Highways and Transportation, informed the Board members the
Highway Department will begin work on the bridge on Route.
620 .around the 15th of October.
1
1
October 1, 1987
Page 441
Chairman Bradby asked the Highway Department's
assi:stance in getting drain pipes installed in driveways
along Route 2013 in the subdivision. Mr. Coates told Mr.
Bradby if the property owners would furnish the pipe the
Department would install same. Mr. Coates and Mr. Bradby
are to meet to formulate a plan.
// ~
.Chairman Bradby called for a public hearing on "An
Ordinance To Provide Standards For Naming Streets,
Fabrication, Erection and Maintenance of Street Name Signs
And To Establish A Street Address Numbering System".
County Attorney. Crook stated the ordinance had been
prepared for the Planning Commission Committee which was
established for this program. Several meetings have been
held by the Committee and the Planning Commission changes
made and it is now being presented to the Board of
Supervisors for their consideration.
Supervisor Turner moved the Board adopt the "Ordinance
To Provide Standards For Naming Streets, Fabrication,
Erection And Maintenance Of Street Name Signs and To
Establish A Street Address Numbering System". The motion
carried unanimously.
AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE STANDARDS
FOR NAMING STREETS, FABRICATION, ERECTION
AND MAINTENANCE OF STREET NAME SIGNS AND
TO ESTABLISH A STREET ADDRESS Ni1MBERING SYSTEM
1
1. Purpose.
The purpose of this ordinance is to provide
for a uniform County wide system with respect to naming
of streets, fabrication, erection and maintenance of
street name signs and assigning street numbers to all
principal buildings to assist fire and rescue
companies, law enforcement agencies, the Postal
Service, and the general public in the timely and
efficient provision of services to residents and
businesses of the County.
2. Administration..
(a) The County Administrator or his designated
agent is hereby designated as the agent of the Board
of Supervisors of Isle of Wight County, Virginia,
responsible for the administration, implementation and
enforcement of this ordinance.
(b) The agent shall establish street names in
accordance with guidelines herein as follows:
~_
(1) Choice of Names. Names should be
pleasant sounding, appropriate and easy to read so that
the public can handle the name in an emergency
situation. The use of similar sounding names shall be
avoided.. Where desired the names should promote the
history or traditions of the County. Surnames of
living persons should not be used except pioneering
families or historically significant names. Un-
conventional spelling shall not be used.
(2) Duplication. Duplication of names
are to be avoided. The agent shall keep a list of the
street names in the County including the incorporated
Towns within the County so that the names will not be
duplicated.
(3) Continuity. Continuous roads as
indicated by State Route numbers shall bear the same
name throughout the County where practical. In
October 1, 1987
Page 402
situations where the road takes a sharp turn in
direction for considerable distance, the affix may be
changed to indicate the change in direction. Short
cul-de-sacs that provide frontage for three or less
lots may bear the same name of the road it intersects.
Names of streets within the incorporated Towns which
continue in the County shall wherever possible bear the
same name in the County.
(4) Generic Classes of Roads for
Street Name Suffixes.
(i) Highways.. Primary roads, such
as, Routes 258, 10, 58, 460, 17 and 32.
(ii) Boulevards. Primary roads or
major collector roads with landscaped divided medians
or unusually wide landscaped rights-of-way, .such as
Routes 10, 32/58 and 17, or the entrance to Carisbrooke
subdivision.
(iii) Drives. Major east-west
through secondaries (secondaries carrying traffic from
one sector to another or through the County) or
collectors, such as, Routes 626, 637, 603, 616 and 611,
or Routes 669 and 665.
(iv) Roads. Major north-south
through secondary or collectors, such as Routes 620,
644, 600 and 621 or Routes 661, 704 and 676.
(v) Parkways. Reserved for
especially scenic routes along rivers or through
park-like landscaping.
(vi) Loops, Circles and Ways. Short
deadend subdivision streets.
{vii) Court.
deadend subdivision streets.
Short, permanently
(viii) Streets.
a basic gridiron subdivision.
North-south streets in
(ix) Avenues.. East-west streets in a
basic gridiron subdivision.
(x) Lanes. Private streets..
(c) The agent shall establish street address
numbers in accordance with guidelines established
herein as follows:
(1) Assignment of addresses. Street
addresses shall be assigned by the agent to each lot
on new final subdivision plats at the time of re-
cordation. The agent shall then notify the re-
spective developer of these addresses.
(2) Renumbering. The agent shall undertake
a systematic renumbering program for streets within
the County in accordance with the policies and
guidelines established herein. In the interim, as
building permit applications are filed for development
on parcels along streets which have not yet been
systematically renumbered, the agent shall determine
and assign an appropriate street address number for
such development prior to approval of such building
permit.
(3) Atlas. As street address numbers are
determined and assigned by the agent as provided above,
such number shall be recorded in an official street
number index and atlas to be maintained by the agent
n
1
1
October 1, 1987
Page 403.
and kept available for reference in the office of real
estate assessment and in the office of the department
of code compliance. No building permit shall be
approved until a street address has been determined and
assigned from the index map and atlas, or in the
absence of a listing for that particular parcel in the
official index, until such building permit application
has been referred to the agent for a street number
determination.
(4) Notification. The affected property
owner or current occupant shall be notified by the
agent in writing of any address change. The property
owner shall be responsible for notifying the Postal
Service, utility companies and other interested
parties of any address change or new address.
(5) Displaying Numbers. Within sixty (60)
days after the receipt of written notification of
change of address, the owner or occupant shall affix/
display the assigned number as prescribed herein.
(6) New Numbers. It shall be the duty of
such owner or occupant, upon affixing the new number,
to remove any different address number. The cost of
the new numbers shall be the responsibility of the
property owner.
(7) Determination of Numbers. Address
numbers shall be based on the location of an individual
parcel within a block.
1
(8) Block. Each segment of a street formed
by intersecting streets shall be considered a separate
block provided however, that where the distance between
intersections is more than twelve hundred (1200) feet,
each twelve-hundred-foot interval shall establish a
separate block. Blocks within subdivisions however,
shall be construed to be the segment of a street
between intersections.
(9) Odd and Even Numbers. Proceeding from
the point of beginning, even numbers shall be assigned
to the parcels situated. on right sides of streets, and
odd numbers shall be assigned to left sides.
(10) Series of Numbers. Numbering series
shall begin with the number 200, and shall begin as
follows:
(i) Where a street begins at an
arterial or collector .road, then street numbering shall
begin at that point of intersection.
1
(ii) Where a street crosses an arterial or
collector road, or when a street connects and
terminates at arterials or collector roads, then street
numbering shall begin at the southernmost or
westernmost end of that street. Provided, however,
that where possible, street prefix designations
(north, east, etc.) shall be assigned to intersecting
streets having the same name on either side of the
arterial or collector and both segments shall be
numbered as prescribed hereinabove, pursuant to Section
15.1-379 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended.
(iii) Numbers shall increase
consecutively from said point of beginning, with two
(2) numbers (one even and one odd) assigned or reserved
for every fifty (50) feet of street frontage for
single-family residential areas, and two (2) numbers
reserved for every twenty-five (25) feet of frontage of
commercial and multifamily areas.
October 1, 1987
Page 404
(11) Reservation of Numbers. Only those
properties which have a princiQal structure shall be
assigned a street address. Numbers shall be reserved,
however, for vacant parcels in accordance with the
intervals described above; provided, however, that in
platted subdivisions, consecutive street numbers shall
be assigned to consecutive lots rather than at the
prescribed intervals. Additional numbers shall be
reserved for oversized lots within subdivisions based
on zoning district frontage requirements to accommodate
potential future divisions.
(12) Building Group Numbers. For multi-
family, commercial and similar developments where
density of development may render the above described
addressing intervals ineffective, a building or
building group may be assigned•a single number and a
numerical or alphabetical suffix may be assigned to
each dwelling unit, business, or establishment within
such building or building group.
(13) Continuity of Numbers. Where major
roads enter the county from another jurisdiction,
street address numbers may be assigned as a
continuation of the numbering series used in that
jurisdiction.
(d) In applying the guidelines specified
herein, the agent shall have the authority to make
minor adjustments and modifications to ensure a logical
and efficient street address system.
(14) Maintenance of Numbers. It shall be the
responsibility of the owner or occupant to maintain the
numbers in good discernible condition.
3. Size and location of street address numbers.
(a) Street address numbers for residences
shall not be less than three (3) inches in height and
shall be made of a durable and clearly visible
material. The numbers shall be conspicuously placed
on, above, or at the side of the main entrance so that
the number is discernible from the street.- Whenever a
building is more than fifty (50) feet from the street,
or when the entrance is not visible from the street,
the number shall be placed. along a walk, driveway, or
another suitable location so that the address number
is discernible from the street. A second and third
set of property numbers must be placed on both sides
of mailbox or other suitable mount adjacent to drive-
way and edge of roadway.
(b) Street address numbers or letters shall be
of a contrasting color to the background on which
they are mounted.
(c) All commercial and industrial structures
shall display street address numbers of not less than
four (4) inches .in height as follows:
(1) When possible, the number shall be
displayed over the main entrance to the structure.
(2) There shall be no other wording or
numbers within two (2) feet of the building number.
(d) Apartments, townhouses, shopping centers
other similar groupings where only one number is
assigned shall display such number at the main
entranceway. Said address numbers shall have a minimum
height of ten (10) inches. Numbers for individual
units or establishments within the complex shall be
1
1
i~
October 1, 1987
Paqe 405
displayed on, above or to the side of the main doorway
of each unit or establishment.
5. Street name signs standard.
fl
(a) General. Metal. street signs of standard
design approved by the agent for use on ail streets
shall be erected on metal poles, at points designated
by the agent, and paid for in advance of erecting by
the subdivider in the cases of subdivision.
(b) Location. At each intersection of public
streets within the County, at least one (1) street name
sign displaying the name of each street shall be
erected and maintained. Whenever possible, street name
signs shall be located in the right-hand corner of the
intersection on the approach side from a major
thoroughfare. When this-ia not possible, street name
signs. shall be located in the next most suitable corner
as determined by the Director of Public Works.
f]
(c) Erection and Fee - Public Streets. At the
request'of a developer and upon receipt of a fee
sufficient to cover the cost of materials and labor, as
determined by the Director of Public Works, the County
shall fabricate, erect and thereafter maintain street
name signs at the intersections of new streets. The
fee shall be paid at the time the plat is recorded. A
developer may specify that street name signs are to be
erected immediately, upon notification, or at the time
the street is accepted into the State secondary
system. Should a developer request street name signs
to be erected prior to the new streets being accepted
into the State secondary system, he shall be
responsible for their maintenance until such time as
the streets are accepted into the system. Prior to
the County accepting a new street for inclusion into
the State system, the County shall make an inspection
to determine that all street name signs are in a state
of good maintenance. Should any street name signs be
missing or in need of repair, the developer shall pay
the full cost for the replacement and/or repair
thereof.
(d) Erection and Fee - Private Streets. At the
request of the majority of the owners of a private
street and upon receipt of a fee sufficient to cover
the cost of materials and labor, as determined by the
Director of Public Works, the County may fabricate,
erect, and thereafter maintain a street name sign at
the intersection of the private street and a public
street.
(e) Description of Signs. Street name signs
bearing the name of public streets shall be of green
background with four (4) inch white letters. Street
name signs bearing the names of private streets shall
be of blue background r~ith four. (4) inch white letters.
For all signs, abbreviations shall be two (2) inch
white letters and no street name shall exceed fifteen
(15) letters, including abbreviations and spaces.
6. Enforcement.
(a) Whenever the agent. has reason to believe
there has been a violation of any provision of this
article, he shall give notice of such violation to the
person failing to comply and order said person to take
corrective measures within thirty (30) days from the
date of notification.
(b) If such person fails to comply with the
duly issued order, the agent shall initiate necessary
actions to terminate the violations through criminal
October 1, 1987 ~ Page 406
and or civil measures.
7. Penalties.
Any violation of any provision of this article
shall constitute a Class 4 misdemeanor. Subsequent to
the thirty-day period following notification of
violation, each day of violation shall constitute a
separate violation.
The Chairman called for a public hearing on the request
of the Isle of Wight/Smithfield Chamber of Commerce to hold
a music festival on October 14, 1987 at Morgart's Beach in
Hardy Magisterial District.
Connie Rhodes, of the Chamber of Commerce, appeared and
stated this would be their 20th Annual Chamber Day and asked
the Board to vote favorably.
On motion of Supervisor Ross, the Board voted
unanimously to approve the request of the Isle of
Wight/Smithfield Chamber of Commerce to hold a music
festival on October 14, 1987 at Morgart's Beach in Hardy
Magisterial District.
Chairman Bradby called for a public hearing on the
following rezoning applications:
1. The application of Odelle S. Carr for a
change ir_ zoning .classification from A-1,
Agricultural Limited, to R-A, Rural Re-
sidential, .9752 acre of land located off
the south side of Route 638, in Hardy
Magisterial District. The purpose of the
application is for a rural residential
lot.
T. A. Powell, Mrs. Carr's nephew, appeared to represent
the application and stated he would be willing to answer any
questions the Board members may have.
No one appeared in opposition.
Supervisor Bradshaw moved the Board approve the
application of Odelle S. Carr for a change in zoning
classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to R-A, Rural
Residential, .9752 acre of land located off the south side
of Route 63$, in Hardy Magisterial District. The vote in
favor was unanimous.
2. The application of Ronald L. Minton for
a change in zoning classification from
R-A, Rural Residential, to R-MH-A, Rural
Mobile Home District, 1.111 acres of•land
located on the east side of Route 681, at
the Routes 681 and 683 intersection, in
Hardy Magisterial District. The purpose
of the application is for the permanent
location of one mobile home.
Regina Minton appeared and stated they had purchased a
lot on Route 681 and is requesting rezoning for a double
wide mobile home.
No one appeared in opposition.
Supervisor Turner moved the Board approve the
application of Ronald L. Minton for a change in zoning
classification from R-A, Rural Residential, to R-MH-A, Rural
Mobile Home District, 1.111 acres of land located on the
east .side of Route 681, at the Routes 681 and 683
intersection, in Hardy Magisterial District. The motion
passed by unanimous vote of the Board.
1
D
October 1, 1987 Page 407
3. The application of Smithfield Swine
.Ranch, owner, and. Christian Well
grilling, prospective owner, for. a
change in zoning classification from
A-1, Agricultural Limited, to Con-
ditional M-1, Conditional Industrial
Limited, 5.15 acres of land located
on the east side of Route 620, between
Routes 655 and 644, in Newport
Magisterial District. The purpose of
the application is for truck rig storage,
maintenance, and repair; plumbing supply
storage and a business sign for a well
drilling operation.
Ted Christian, co-owner, appeared and stated the land
is presently zoned agricultural and they would like to use
the land for a small well drilling operation. Mr. Christian
continued stating the operation will not proposed any more
problem than the swine operation and feels it will be an
asset to the County. Mr. Christian further stated there
will be no visual and noise pollution as the area is
surrounded by trees. The well drilling trucks are not any
larger than the swine trucks, stated Mr. Christian. Mr.
Christian stated the Planning Commission denied the
application because the proposed use is not compatible with
the growing residential use of the land in the area.
Gurley .Barlow, co-owner, stated the hog .business was
good, but the hogs do not stay at home. Mr. Barlow stated
he wished the Board would give favorable consideration. He
(Mr. Barlow) stated he would not want to do anything to
hinder growth in isle of Wight County.
1
Cecil W. Gwaltney, adjoining property owner, appeared
and stated the property is in an area which is becoming
residential. Mr. Gwaltney continued stating the pig parlor
business had been there some years back and stayed in
operation for a while. Mr. Gwaltney stated he feels it
would be wrong to allow the proposed business in the area
because it is a residential area and we should keep this
property in line with what is there now. Mr. Gwaltney
stated the proposed use of the property. affects him mostly
as he borders on three sides of the property in question.
Planning Director Lewis stated the Planning Commission
recommended denial .noting that the property was better
suited for residential development similar to that currently
being developed in the area because of the area's
development trends and because it would not be in keeping
with good planning to permit industrial type uses to be
located within a developing residential area and on roadways
that primarily serve residential neighborhoods. He said the
Planning Commission suggested that a location on a primary
road within an existing commercial or industrial area or an
area anticipated for business development would be the best
location for this type of proposed business.
1
Mr. Lewis continued stating the Department of Highways
and Transportation has advised that the entrance to this
property would have to be a commercial entrance constructed
in accordance with standards of the Department of Highways
and Transportation and that any outdoor advertising
associated with the proposed business must be approved by
the Department of Highways and Transportation.
Following general discussion, Supervisor Ross moved the
Board accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and
deny the application of Smithfield Swine Ranch, owner, and
Christian Well Drilling, prospective owner, for a change in
zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to
Conditional M-1, Conditional Industrial Limited, 5.25 acres
of land located on the east side of Route 620, between
Routes 655 and 644, in Newport Magisterial District. The
October 1, 1987
Page 408
motion passed with Supervisors Ross, Bailey and Bradby
voting aye and Supervisors Turner and Bradshaw nay.
4. The application of Alda O. Garner and
W. B. Owen for a change in zoning
classification from A-1, Agricultural
Limited, to R-1, Residential Limited,
25 acres of land located on the south
side of Route 1903, between C. L. Obrey
Subdivision and Cedar Grove Farm, in
Newport Magisterial District. The pur-
pose of the application is for a re-
sidential subdivision.
Ann Simpson Jones, attorney, appeared to represent the
applicants and stated the Planning Commission unanimously
approved the application on September 8th and she asked the
Board to do the same.
No one appeared in opposition.
Supervisor Bradshaw moved the Board approve the
application of Alda O. Garner and W. B. Owen for a change in
zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to
R-1, Residential Limited, 15 acres of land located on the
south side of Route 1903, between C. L. Obrey Subdivision
and Cedar Grove Farm, in Newport Magisterial District. The
vote in favor was unanimous.
5. The application of Richard L and Edna
B. Turner, owners, and Stephen B.
Strickland,. Inc. prospective owner, for a
change in the zoning classification
from A-1, Agricultural Limited, to
Conditional R-1, Conditional Re-
sidential Limited, approximately 87
acres of land located on the west side
of Route 10, between Routes 620 and
600, in Newport Magisterial District.
The purpose of the application is for
no more than 93 single family re-
sidential lots.
Supervisor Turner stepped down from the dias and joined
the audience because of a conflict of interest.
Sterling Webster, representing the applicant, appeared
and stated they are seeking zoning that will allow the
creation of a subdivision of no more than 93 single family
dwellings.
The developers offered the following proferred
conditions, (1) a 50 foot scenic landscaping easement
parallel with Route 10, (2) landscaped center island at main
entrance, (3) no more than 93 lots, (4) paved streets to be
provided, (5) a 50 foot wide landscape visual buffer along
Route 10 to~help block the view of the development from
Route 10 and (6) a landscape median strip will be provided
at the main entrance.
Mr. Lewis stated the the Planning Commission voted to
recommend approval noting the maximum number of lots, 93,
was close to the number that could be developed if the land
was zoned R-A. It also noted that the buffer along Route 10
and the proposed landscaped entrance would help the
subdivision be less obtrusive to its surroundings.
Additionally, it note that its location on Route 10 will
provide direct access to a primary road and there are a
number of existing or anticipated subdivisions in this
general area.
Mr. Lewis further reported that the Public Service
Authority noting that the proposed County Water and Sewer
Master Plan recommends central water to be conveyed to the
1
f1
1
October 1, 1987 Page 409
1
County Authority, unanimously voted to recommend that the
applicants add a condition stating the central water system
anticipated for the development will be constructed in
accordance with the regulations of the Public Service
Authority and will be conveyed to the Public Service
Authority at no cost if accepted by the Authority.
The Department of Highways and Transportation noted the
main entrance to the development must be aligned with the
existing crossover on Route 10 and that a complete set of
road construction plans must be submitted for review of the
Department.
Robert P. Taylor, Jr., adjoining property owner on the
north side of the property, appeared in opposition. Mr.
Taylor stated he has a general purpose farm consisting of
hogs and cattle raising and farming. Mr. Taylor further
stated he is opposed because it is too much of a jump at one
time. The area is located in the Longview Agricultural
District which is large, stated Mr. Taylor. Mr. Taylor
continued stating he has no plans whatsoever to have any
kind of business except farming and the adjoining property
owners do not plan to change their farming operations. Mr.
Taylor stated the 93 homes is not in keeping with the area
and traffic will be a problem.
Mary Jean Scott spoke in opposition stating she would
like to see the area remain as it is because if the farming
operation decreases their heritage *ail~ change. She doesn't
want to see homes built on the farmland.
Sterling Webster stated the main reason they requested
R-1 zoning was for lot configuration to address the septic
tank situation, not high density.
D
Following discussion, Supervisor Ross moved the Board
accept the Planning Commission's recommendation and aAprove
the application of Richard L. and Edna B. Turner, owners,
and Stephen B. Strickland, Inc., prospective owner, for a
change in zoning classification from A-1, Agricultural
Limited, to Conditional R-1, Conditional Residential
Limited, approximately 87 acres of land located on the west
side of Route 10, between Routes 620 and 600, in Newport
Magisterial District. The motion carried with Supervisors
Ross, Bradshaw and Bradby voting aye and Supervisor Bailey
nay. Supervisor Turner did not vote.
//
Rev. Vincent L. Thomas, Pastor of the First Gravel Hill
Baptist Church, stated he was outraged and angry with the
County's hiring practices. Rev. Thomas quoted excerpts from
the local newspapers .relative to persons being employed by
the County and stated that Doug Caskey, who has been
employed as Community Development Director, has a degree in
geography and minored in urban and regional planning. Rev.
Thomas further stated that two employees from Suffolk had
been hired and another one which is a recent graduate. Rev.
Thomas feels the best applicants were not offered the job
and also stated many persons were not given an .interview.
Rev. Thomas feels consideration should be fair for everyone.
1
Wesley Wills, real estate broker representing the
Robert Allen Johnson estate, appeared and asked the Board's
consideration and assistance regarding the sewer and water
in that area. Mr. Wills stated he understood some progress
was being made, but they need sewer as quickly as possible
because they have the possibility of selling_property for an
industrial venture. Mr. Wills further stated he had
discussed this situation with the Public Service Authority.
//
October 1, 1987
Planning Director Lewis presented the following
conditional use permit application for the Board's
consideration:
The application of Marie B. King,
owner, and Commonwealth Gas Pipeline
Corporation, prospective owner, for
a conditional use permit to erect a
16' x 16' structure for measuring and
and regulating natural gas distribut-
ion, on 36 acre of land located on
Routes 32 and 258, in Newport
Magisterial District.
Page 410
Chairman Bradby stated the applicant had sent a litter
requesting the application be withdrawn. On motion of
Supervisor Turner, the Board voted unanimously to grant the
applicant's request to withdraw his application.
//
At 3:17 P. M. Supervisor Turner moved to have a ten
minute recess, which passed unanimously. The Board
reconvened at 3:35 P. M.
//
County Attorney Crook stated he had a matter for
executive session.
Supervisor Turner moved the Board go into executive
session for the purpose of discussing with legal counsel and
staff members land acquisition, public use of county
property, personnel and intergovernmental contract
negotiations. The vote in favor was unanimous. The Board
went into executive session at 3:36 P. M. and returned to
open session at 5:07 P. M.
//
County Adn-instrator Standish recommended the Board
agree to the offer of the Public Service Authority to
construct the sewer line extension in the Camptown/Jamestown
area and the previous action of the Board regarding the
deeding of the system at the conclusion of the talks with
the City of Franklin'.
Supervisor Bailey moved the Public .Service Authority be
authorized to negotiate rates/fees with the Town of
Smithfield for water distribution system of Cypress Run
development. The motion carried unanimously.
On motion of Supervisor Ross, the Board voted
unanimously to advise County Attorney Crook td request the
School Board to deed the waterline running from the Town of
Smithfield to the new Smithfield High School to be deeded
~~ the County.
At 5:10 P. M. Supervisor Turner left the Board meeting.
//
Supervisor Ross moved the Board accept the State/Local
hospitalization contracts as presented by the Social
Services Department and authorized Linda Bean, Director of
Social Services, to re-negotiate the with Mary Immaculate
Hospital regarding rates. The motion passed by unanimous
vote of the Board. Supervisor Turner was absent when the
vote was taken.
State - Local Hospitalization
1
1
1
1986-87 1987-88
1
October 1, 1987
Page 411.
Hospital In-Pat. Out-Pat. In-Pat. Out-Pat.
Lousie Obici $352.49 $239.69 $376.84 $256.25
Riverside 340.05 231.23 361.31 245.69
Walter Reed 297.97 202.62 302.34 204.91
Mary Immaculate 350.00 239.00 467.67 318.02
Hampton General 342.93 233.19 385.97 262.46
Southampton Memorial 327.88 222.96 281.94 292.72
Supervisor Ross moved the Board approve the suggestion
of the Commissioner of Revenue, Gerald H. Gwaltney, for a
correction of assessments and refunds ordinance for the
County with the .condition the proposed ordinance be amended
to state the County Aiaorney gill review and approve same.
Supervisor Bailey amended the motion to add upon
certification by the County Attorney the Board can authorize
the Treasurer to make the refunds. The vote in favor was
unanimous. Supervisor Turner was absent when the vote was
taken.
On motion of Supervisor Ross, the Board unanimously
voted to adopt the resolution approving the $1.3 million
bond issue for School capital improvements.
RESOLUTION
At a regular meeting of the Board of Super-
visors of Isle of Wight County, Virginia, held
on the 1st day of October, 1987, at which the
following members were present and absent:
D
Present: Henry H. Bradby
C. Fred Bailey
Joel C. Bradshaw, Jr.
Thomas L. Ross
Absent: Richard L. Turner
The following resolution was adopted by a
majority of all members of the Board of Super-
visors by a roll call vote, the ayes and nays
being recorded in the minutes of the meeting as
shown below:
Member Vote
Henry H. Bradby Aye
C. Fred Bailey Aye
Joel C. Bradshaw., Jr. Aye
Thomas L. Ross Aye
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AWARD OF $1,305,000
SCHOOL BONDS, SERIES OF 1987, OF ISLE OF
WIGHT COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TO VIRGINIA
PUBLIC SCHOOL AUTHORITY, AND CHANGING
DESIGNATION OF PAYING AGENT
1
WHEREAS, by resolution .adopted on August
27, 1987 (the Prior Resolution), the Board of
Supervisors of Isle of Wight County, Virginia
(the County), provided for the issuance of
$1,305,000 School Bonds, Series of 1987 (the
Bonds)j
WHEREAS, such resolution authorized
the County Administrator to awar3 the Bonds
to the Virginia Public School Authority (the
Authority). at such inter^st rate or rates as
would produce a differential in each year of
not more than one-tenth of one percent
(1/10 of 18) over the annual rate to be paid
by the Authority on the bonds it will sell to
provide funds to purchase the County's Bonds,
provided that the net interest cost to the
October 1, 1987
County should not exceed 98 per year]
Page 412
WHEREAS, on September 17, 1987, the
County Administrator on behalf of the County
awarded the bonds, bearing interest at the
annual rates shown on Exhibit A hereto, to
the Authority; and,
WHEREAS, the County has been requested
to change the designation of the paying agent
for the Bonds;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPER-
VISORS OF ISLE OF WIGHT COUNTY, VIRGINIA:
1. The action of the County Administrator
on September 17, 1987, awarding the Bonds to
the Authority, is hereby ratified, approved and
confirmed. The Bonds shall bear interest at the
annual rates shown on Exhibit A.
2. The Paying Agent for the Bonds, as
described in Section 3 of the Prior Resolution,
shall be Dominion Trust Company, Richmond,
Virginia.
The undersigned Clerk of The Board of
Supervisors of Isle of Wight County, Virginia,
hereby certifies that the foregoing con-
stitutes a true and correct extract from the
minutes of a regular meeting of the Board of
Supervisors held the 1st day of October, 1987,
and of the whole thereof so far as applicable
to the matters referred to in such extract.
Supervisor Ross moved the Board adopt the resolution
calling upon the County to provide increased financial
support for programs for mentally disabled citizens.
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ISLE
OF WIGHT COUNTY
WHEREAS, The County of Isle of Wight
is concerned about our mentally disabled
citizens, and
WHEREAS, many disabled citizens are
unserved or under-served, and
WHEREAS, the County of Isle of Wight
supports the Western Tidewater Community
Services Board with local tax funds, and
WHEREAS, the County of Isle of Wight
has only limited resources to fund services
which have traditionally been the purview
of State government, and
WHEREAS, community services for the
mentally disabled citizens are already
limited throughout the Commonwealth, and
the demand for such services are ever in-
creasing.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT
the County of Isle of Wight Board of Super-
visors requests the Governor and the General
Assembly to provide and support a major
funding initiative for services for the
mentally disabled as the high priority
issue for the 1.988-1990 Biennium.
Supervisor Bailey moved the Board authorize County
Administrator Standish.-to submit comments relative to the
1
October 1, 1987
Page 413
Chesapeake Bay Agreement urging that no new mandates be
placed on the County without equivalent financial support
and in addition, requirements placed on the County must also
provide for appropriate protection from liability for any
measures taken to manage growth in a responsible manner.
The motion carried unanimously. Supervisor Turner was
absent when the vote was taken.
On motion of Supervisor Ross, the Board voted
unanimously to approve the Federal Government/Corps of
Engineers grant funds, and authorized the Chairman to sign
same, for improvements to the Nike Park area under the
program to clean up. Supervisor Turner was absent when the
vote was taken.
//
Supervisor Bailey moved the Board approve the General
Fund Bill Register as amended. The vote in favor was
unanimous. Supervisor Turner wa.s absent when the vote was
taken.
//
County Attorney Crook informed the Board that the
September 3, 1987 minutes were not ready for approval.
I/
At 5:24 P. M. Supervisor P.oss moved the meeting be
adjourned, which passed unanimously. Supervisor Turner was
absent when the vote was taken.
1
1
~f ~/ % - tom- li i~
~~ienry H. Bradby, Chairman